首页> 外文期刊>Cognitive therapy and research >The Impact of Perceived Standards on State Anxiety, Appraisal Processes, and Negative Pre- and Post-event Rumination in Social Anxiety Disorder
【24h】

The Impact of Perceived Standards on State Anxiety, Appraisal Processes, and Negative Pre- and Post-event Rumination in Social Anxiety Disorder

机译:感知标准对社会焦虑症中国家焦虑,评估过程以及事前和事后负面思考的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cognitive models emphasise the importance of pre- and post-event rumination as maintaining factors of Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD), however, there is limited research investigating pre-event rumination. This study aims to examine several key hypotheses posited by the cognitive models by experimentally manipulating social standards in order to examine the impact of high and low perceived social standards on appraisal processes, state anxiety, and negative rumination, and to determine if the predictors of pre-event rumination will mirror those of post-event rumination. The sample consisted of 91 participants, including 46 participants with SAD and 45 non-anxious controls. Socially anxious participants in this study engaged in more pre- and post-event rumination, had higher threat appraisals, and lower self-appraisals of performance than non-anxious controls. Socially anxious participants who believed that they were expected to perform to a high standard in anticipation of a speech task reported poorer ratings of self-efficacy than socially anxious participants in the low standard condition and non-anxious controls. Additionally, whilst anticipated self-appraisals of performance, threat appraisal, self-efficacy, and state anxiety were predictive of pre-event rumination, threat appraisal was the only significant predictor of post-event rumination. This study extends the current knowledge of the cognitive processes within SAD, which has clinical implications.
机译:认知模型强调了事前和事后反刍作为维持社交焦虑症(SAD)的因素的重要性,但是,研究事前反刍的研究还很有限。这项研究旨在通过实验性地操纵社会标准来检验认知模型所提出的几个关键假设,以检验高低感知的社会标准对评估过程,状态焦虑和消极反感的影响,并确定是否预知事件反思将反映事件后反思。样本包括91名参与者,包括46名SAD参与者和45名非焦虑对照者。与非焦虑对照相比,本研究中有社交焦虑的参与者在事前和事后进行了更多的思考,对威胁的评估更高,对绩效的自我评估也更低。认为预期在语音任务中预期会表现出较高水准的社交焦虑参与者报告称,与低标准条件和非焦虑控制下的社交焦虑参与者相比,他们的自我效能评分较差。此外,尽管预期的绩效自我评估,威胁评估,自我效能感和状态焦虑可以预测事前反思,但威胁评估是事后反思的唯一重要预测指标。这项研究扩展了SAD内认知过程的当前知识,具有临床意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号