首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation >Comparison of emergent versus elective laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for patients with or without nonsevere acute cholangitis complicated with common bile duct stones
【24h】

Comparison of emergent versus elective laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for patients with or without nonsevere acute cholangitis complicated with common bile duct stones

机译:急诊腹腔镜与择期腹腔镜胆总管探查在有无严重急性胆管炎合并胆总管结石患者中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has already been established for the treatment of patients with common bile duct stones (CBDS) in elective situations. However, the effect of emergent LCBDE on those patients with nonsevere acute cholangitis has not been assessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of emergent LCBDE on patients with nonsevere acute cholangitis complicated with CBDS. Methods Seventy-two patients with CBDS admitted from January 2009 to December 2012 were included for this retrospective study. LCBDE of transductal approach for CBDS was performed to all patients. Thirty-seven patients underwent emergent LCBDE for nonsevere acute cholangitis and 35 patients underwent elective LCBDE. Duration of the procedure, complications, retained stone of bile duct, hospital stay, and total charges were compared between the two groups. In addition, the characteristics of patients underwent emergent LCBDE were also compared before and after surgery. Results There was no significant difference with regard to the diameter of common bile duct and number of CBDS from imaging and/or operative findings between the two groups. There was no conversion to open common bile duct exploration, no major bile duct injuries, and no mortality in both the group of patients. There was no significant difference in patients with or without acute or chronic cholecystitis, duration of surgery, overall hospital stay (16.41 ± 1.03 versus 14.54 ± 0.94, P > 0.05), and total charges (18,603 ± 1774.64 versus 14,951 ± 1257.09 Yuan in renminbi, P > 0.05) between the two groups. Four cases with retained stones were found in patients with emergent LCBDE and two in elective LCBDE patients. There were four cases of biliary leak in patients with emergent LCBDE and three cases in elective LCBDE group, respectively. However, there was no statistical difference between the two groups. The biliary leak was cured postoperatively after drainage. Control of septic symptoms was achieved in all patients after emergent LCBDE. Conclusions Our data indicated that emergent LCBDE is as safe and effective as elective LCBDE for the treatment of patients with nonsevere acute cholangitis complicated with CBDS.
机译:背景技术已经建立了腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE),用于治疗选择性情况下的胆总管结石(CBDS)患者。然而,尚未评估紧急LCBDE对那些非严重急性胆管炎患者的影响。这项研究的目的是评估紧急LCBDE对非严重急性胆管炎合并CBDS患者的影响。方法回顾性分析2009年1月至2012年12月收治的72例CBDS患者。对所有患者均进行了CBDS导通途径的LCBDE。 37例因非严重急性胆管炎接受了紧急LCBDE治疗,35例接受了选择性LCBDE治疗。比较两组的手术时间,并发症,胆管结石残留,住院时间和总费用。此外,还比较了术前和术后接受紧急LCBDE的患者的特征。结果两组患者的胆总管直径和CBDS数量在影像学和/或手术结果方面均无显着差异。两组患者都没有转换为开放性胆总管探查术,没有严重的胆管损伤,也没有死亡率。有无急性或慢性胆囊炎,手术时间,总住院时间(16.41±1.03对14.54±0.94,P> 0.05)和总费用(人民币18,603±1774.64对14,951±1257.09元)无显着差异。 ,P> 0.05)。紧急LCBDE患者中发现4例结石保留,而选择性LCBDE患者中发现2例。紧急LCBDE患者胆道渗漏4例,选择性LCBDE组胆道渗漏3例。但是,两组之间没有统计学差异。引流术后胆漏得以治愈。 LCBDE出现后,所有患者均可控制败血症症状。结论我们的数据表明,对于非严重急性胆管炎并发CBDS的患者,紧急LCBDE与选择性LCBDE一样安全有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号