首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation >Evaluation of toxic side effects of clinically used skin antiseptics in vitro.
【24h】

Evaluation of toxic side effects of clinically used skin antiseptics in vitro.

机译:评价临床上使用的皮肤消毒剂的体外毒副作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Skin antiseptics are widely used in health-care worldwide. However, there is a need to determine cytotoxicity of these medications on wounds. The aim of this study was to evaluate cytotoxic effects of five clinically used antiseptics on human skin cells. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five clinically used skin antiseptics (Prontosan, Lavasept, Braunol, Octenisept, and Betaisodona) were tested. The minimal inhibitory concentration was determined against Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli). The cytotoxic effects on primary keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and a HaCaT cell line were determined (MTT-assay and BrdU-ELISA) at a wide range of concentrations. RESULTS: The agents tested showed effective antibacterial properties (Octenisept, Lavasept, and Prontosan showed higher efficacy than Braunol and Betaisodona) and different degrees of cytotoxicity. Lavasept and Prontosan demonstrated less toxicity on primary human fibroblasts and keratinocytes, whereas Octenisept, Betaisodona, and Braunol showed a significant (P<0.05) decrease in cell viability to 0% on keratinocytes at concentrations of 4%, 7.5%, and 12.5%, and on fibroblasts at 7.5% and 10%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Due to the cytotoxic effect of some antiseptics on human skin cells, it is advised that health care professionals balance the cytotoxicity of the medication, their antiseptic properties, and the severity of colonization when selecting a wound care antiseptic. In this study, Lavasept and Prontosan showed best result regarding antibacterial efficacy and cell toxicity.
机译:背景:皮肤消毒剂在全世界的医疗保健中被广泛使用。但是,需要确定这些药物在伤口上的细胞毒性。这项研究的目的是评估五种临床使用的杀菌剂对人皮肤细胞的细胞毒性作用。材料和方法:测试了五种临床使用的皮肤消毒剂(Prontosan,Lavasept,Braunoll,Octenisept和Betaisodona)。确定对金黄色葡萄球菌,粪肠球菌,铜绿假单胞菌和大肠杆菌的最小抑制浓度。在广泛的浓度范围内,测定了对原代角质形成细胞,成纤维细胞和HaCaT细胞系的细胞毒性作用(MTT测定和BrdU-ELISA)。结果:所测试的药物显示出有效的抗菌特性(奥曲尼司特,拉瓦瑟普和普罗托桑显示出比布劳诺和倍他索多纳更高的功效)和不同程度的细胞毒性。 Lavasept和Prontosan对原代人成纤维细胞和角质形成细胞的毒性较小,而Octenisept,Betaisodona和Braunol在浓度分别为4%,7.5%和12.5%的角质形成细胞上则显示出显着(P <0.05)的细胞活力降低至0%,和成纤维细胞分别为7.5%和10%。结论:由于某些防腐剂对人皮肤细胞的细胞毒性作用,建议医疗保健专业人员在选择伤口护理防腐剂时,应平衡药物的细胞毒性,其防腐性能和定植的严重程度。在这项研究中,Lavasept和Prontosan在抗菌功效和细胞毒性方面显示出最佳结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号