...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Surgical Oncology >Is the need for an arterial resection a contraindication to pancreatic resection for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma? A case-matched controlled study.
【24h】

Is the need for an arterial resection a contraindication to pancreatic resection for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma? A case-matched controlled study.

机译:对于局部晚期胰腺癌,需要进行动脉切除术是胰腺切除术的禁忌症吗?病例匹配的对照研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Arterial resection (AR) has traditionally been considered as a contraindication to pancreatic resection for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The objective was to evaluate if pancreatic resection with AR was worthwhile. METHODS: Between January 1990 and December 2008 the records of 26 consecutive patients who underwent a curative-intent pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with AR (AR+ group) were matched 1:1 to those of the whole series of pancreatic resection performed in our institution. The final study population (n = 52) included two groups of patients: the study group AR+ = 26 and the control group AR- = 26. RESULTS: The 1- and 3-year survival rates were similar in the two groups (65.9% and 22.1%, median 17 months for the group AR + , versus 50.0% and 17.6%, median 12 months, for the group AR-; P = 0.581). The multivariate analysis showed that: arterial wall invasion at the site of AR, the total number of resected lymph nodes of
机译:背景与目的:动脉切除术(AR)传统上被认为是局部晚期胰腺癌的胰腺切除术的禁忌症。目的是评估胰腺切除联合AR是否值得。方法:在1990年1月至2008年12月之间,连续26例行AR的胰腺腺癌根治性切除术(AR +组)的记录与本研究中进行的整个胰腺切除术的记录1:1匹配机构。最终研究人群(n = 52)包括两组患者:研究组AR + = 26和对照组AR- =26。结果:两组的1年和3年生存率相似(65.9%) AR +组的中位数为17个月,中位数为17个月,为22.1%; AR-组的中位数为12个月,中位数为12个月,分别为50.0%和17.6%; P = 0.581)。多元分析表明:AR部位的动脉壁浸润,切除的淋巴结总数≤15和神经周浸润是生存的独立预后因素。结论:对于患有腺癌的胰腺切除术,其AR的3生存率与不需要AR的患者的配对组相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号