首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Surgical Oncology >Is it time to reconsider the BCLC/AASLD therapeutic flow-chart?
【24h】

Is it time to reconsider the BCLC/AASLD therapeutic flow-chart?

机译:是时候重新考虑BCLC / AASLD治疗流程图了吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Recommendations of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) therapeutic flow-chart, endorsed by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), are the most applied worldwide. Over recent years, however, several referral centers have questioned some of the BCLC treatment allocations and proposed alternative strategies. The present study plans to review and discuss these suggestions, with the aim to evaluate whether there are well-grounded reasons to reconsider some of the BCLC/AASLD recommendations. METHODS: A search was made into the MEDLINE database, focusing on randomized controlled trials, meta-analysis reviews, case-control studies, concordant clinical trials on novel therapies and studies reporting the opinion of respected experts. Their results and conclusions were compared stage by stage with BCLC/AASLD recommendations. RESULTS: In stage 0 (very early, or single <2 cm, or carcinoma in situ, Child A) radiofrequency should replace resection. In stage A (early, or single or three nodules up to 3 cm, Child A-B) radiofrequency and resection should expand their indications. In stage B (intermediate, or multinodular, Child A-B) resection and transplantation should expand their indications, while intra-arterial therapies are changing from conventional to selective treatments. In stage C (advanced, portal invasion or extrahepatic disease, Child A-B) systemic therapies should offer previously unknown promising options. CONCLUSION: In our opinion, so much evidence leads to suggest it is time to reconsider several BCLC/AASLD recommendations. Some treatments are comparable in results but vary in costs, local availability, or complication rates.
机译:目的:获得美国肝脏疾病研究协会(AASLD)认可的巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)治疗流程图的建议,在世界范围内应用最为广泛。但是,近年来,一些转诊中心对BCLC的一些治疗分配提出了质疑,并提出了替代策略。本研究计划审查和讨论这些建议,旨在评估是否有充分理由重新考虑BCLC / AASLD的一些建议。方法:对MEDLINE数据库进行了搜索,重点是随机对照试验,荟萃分析综述,病例对照研究,有关新疗法的一致临床试验以及报告了受人尊敬的专家意见的研究。他们的结果和结论与BCLC / AASLD的建议进行了逐步比较。结果:在0期(非常早,或单个<2 cm,或原位癌,Child A)中,射频应代替切除术。在A期(早期或单个或三个结节,最大3厘米,儿童A-B),射频和切除术应扩大其适应症。在B期(中间或多结节,Child A-B)中,切除和移植应扩大其适应症,而动脉内治疗正从常规治疗变为选择性治疗。在C期(晚期,门静脉侵袭或肝外疾病,Child A-B),系统疗法应提供以前未知的有希望的选择。结论:我们认为,大量证据表明该是重新考虑BCLC / AASLD若干建议的时候了。某些治疗方法的结果可比,但成本,局部可用性或并发症发生率各不相同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号