首页> 外文期刊>Journal of surgical education >Medical students pursuing surgical fields have no greater innate motor dexterity than those pursuing nonsurgical fields
【24h】

Medical students pursuing surgical fields have no greater innate motor dexterity than those pursuing nonsurgical fields

机译:追求外科领域的医学生与不追求外科领域的医学生相比,其固有的运动敏捷性没有更大的优势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Medical students pursue different career paths based on a variety of factors. We sought to examine the impact of innate manual dexterity, both perceived and objective, on the career interests of medical students. Methods: Third-year medical students from the University of California, Irvine were recruited for this study. Subjects completed a pretest questionnaire followed by assessment of gross and fine motor dexterity using the Purdue Pegboard test. A total of 6 independent trials were performed, 3 for each hand. The scores were recorded as an integer value between 0 and 25. A statistical analysis was performed using student t tests, the Fischer exact test, or the χ 2 test, where appropriate. Results: A total of 100 students completed the questionnaire while 58 completed the dexterity testing. Students interested in a surgical field (SF) were similar in handedness, gender, video game exposure, and learning style as those interested in a nonsurgical field (NSF). In the SF group, "personal skill set" was reported as the most common factor influencing career selection, and "interest in disease process/patient population" was reported most commonly by NSF students (p = 0.015). Although a perceived innate manual dexterity was higher among SF students compared with NSF students (p = 0.032), no significant objective differences were found in right hand, left hand, or combined dexterity scores. Conclusions: Perceived "personal skill set" may influence strongly a medical student's career choice. Despite greater perceived manual dexterity, students interested in an SF do not have greater objective innate manual dexterity than those interested in an NSF.
机译:简介:医学生会根据多种因素选择不同的职业道路。我们试图研究天生的手动敏捷性(无论是感知的还是客观的)对医学生职业兴趣的影响。方法:招募来自加利福尼亚大学欧文分校的三年级医学生进行这项研究。受试者完成了预测试问卷,然后使用Purdue Pegboard测试评估了总体和精细运动敏捷度。总共进行了6次独立试验,每只手进行3次。分数记录为0到25之间的整数。在适当的情况下,使用Student t检验,Fischer精确检验或χ2检验进行统计分析。结果:共有100名学生完成了问卷,而58名学生完成了敏捷性测试。对外科领域(SF)感兴趣的学生在惯性,性别,视频游戏曝光和学习方式方面与对非外科领域(NSF)感兴趣的学生相似。在SF组中,“个人技能”被报告为影响职业选择的最常见因素,而NSF学生最普遍地报告了“对疾病过程/患者群体的兴趣”(p = 0.015)。尽管与NSF学生相比,SF学生的固有先天敏捷度更高(p = 0.032),但在右手,左手或综合敏捷得分方面均未发现明显的客观差异。结论:感知的“个人技能”可能会强烈影响医学生的职业选择。尽管对手动技巧的感知更大,但对SF感兴趣的学生并不比对NSF感兴趣的学生具有更高的客观天生手动技巧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号