...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Surgical Oncology >Radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) versus wire-guided lumpectomy for non-palpable breast lesions: a randomized prospective evaluation.
【24h】

Radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) versus wire-guided lumpectomy for non-palpable breast lesions: a randomized prospective evaluation.

机译:放射性隐匿性病变定位(ROLL)与线引导性肿块切除术治疗不可触及的乳腺病变:一项随机的前瞻性评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: It is important to optimize the localization technique for non-palpable breast lesions. METHODS: One hundred consecutive women with non-palpable breast lesions were randomized to radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) or wire localization (WL). For ROLL technique (99m)Tc-labeled particles of human serum albumin were injected under breast-imaging control. Localization of the lesion was done in the operating room with the aid of a gamma-probe. All lesions were identified in an X-ray control of the surgical specimen. Categorical variables were analyzed with the Chi-square method. Significance was considered at P < 0.05. RESULTS: All procedures were performed on the same day of excision, on ambulatory basis. Both techniques resulted in 100% retrieval of the lesions. Localization time was reduced with ROLL (P < 0.001). Clear margins were achieved in 88.9% ROLLs and 62.5% WLs (P < 0.05) reducing the requirement of re-excision. There were significant differences in the subjective ease of the procedures in favor of ROLL technique as rated by surgeons and radiologists. CONCLUSIONS: ROLL technique is as effective as WL for excision of non-palpable breast lesions, reduce localization time and probably the incidence of pathologically involved margins of excision. ROLL appears to improve the learning curve for surgical residents and cosmesis. ROLL is an attractive alternative to WL.
机译:背景:优化不可触及乳腺病变的定位技术非常重要。方法:将连续一百名患有无法触及的乳腺病变的妇女随机分为放射性引导的隐匿性病变定位(ROLL)或金属丝定位(WL)。对于ROLL技术,在乳腺成像控制下注射Tc标记的人血清白蛋白颗粒(99m)。病变的定位是在手术室中借助伽马探针进行的。所有病变均在手术标本的X射线控制下确定。使用卡方方法分析分类变量。显着性被认为在P <0.05。结果:所有手术均在非手术当天进行。两种技术都可以100%修复病变。 ROLL减少了本地化时间(P <0.001)。在88.9%的滚装和62.5%的滚装中获得了明显的利润率(P <0.05),从而降低了重新切除的要求。在外科医生和放射科医生的评价下,在支持ROLL技术的过程中,主观上的操作存在明显差异。结论:ROLL技术与WL一样有效地切除了不可触及的乳腺病变,减少了定位时间,并可能减少了与病理相关的切除边缘的发生率。 ROLL似乎可以改善外科手术患者和美容的学习曲线。 ROLL是WL的一种有吸引力的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号