...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of surgical education >Are the communication and professionalism competencies the new critical values in a resident's global evaluation process?
【24h】

Are the communication and professionalism competencies the new critical values in a resident's global evaluation process?

机译:交流和专业能力是否是居民全球评估过程中的新关键价值?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The ACGME requires the assessment of resident competency in 6 domains. Global evaluations covering all 6 competencies are routinely used. Evaluators may be overly influenced by resident affability and availability, thereby resulting in a halo effect. We hypothesized that the Interpersonal Skills and Communications (ICS) and Professionalism (PR) competencies would unduly influence other competency scores. METHODS: General surgery resident evaluations are performed by staff and peers on a rotational basis using competency-based questions. Each question is scored using a 5-point Likert scale. Mean individual composite scores for each competency were calculated and then correlated with other mean composite competency scores. Data from patient evaluations were similarly analyzed. A final correlation of competency scores to ABSITE scores, as an objective, standardized measure of a specific competency, Medical knowledge (MK) was also performed. RESULTS: Results were available for 37 residents (PGY1-5). There was a significant association between ICS scores and higher scores in MK (r = 0.52, p = 0.004), PR (r = 0.826, p < 0.0001) and patient care (PC) (r = 0.619, p < 0.0001). No correlation, however, was found between patient evaluations of residents and their faculty/peer-based ICS scores. We found no association between ICS scores and improved patient evaluations. Lastly, we found no association between ICS or MK scores and ABSITE scores. CONCLUSIONS: It was difficult to ascertain whether residents with better ICS scores had higher PR, PC, and MK scores because of the halo effect, improper completion of evaluations, or whether those residents were truly performing better clinically. External measures of resident performance did not correlate with faculty/peer evaluations of ICS and PR. Residency programs should consider adopting a more standardized way to objectively evaluate residents.
机译:背景:ACGME需要评估6个领域的居民能力。通常会使用涵盖所有6个能力的全局评估。评估者可能会受到居民亲和力和可用性的过度影响,从而导致光环效应。我们假设人际交往能力(ICS)和专业能力(PR)的能力会不适当地影响其他能力得分。方法:普通外科住院医师的评估是由员工和同伴轮流使用基于胜任力的问题进行的。每个问题均使用5点李克特量表进行评分。计算每种能力的平均个人综合得分,然后将其与其他平均综合能力得分相关联。来自患者评估的数据也进行了类似的分析。胜任力得分与ABSITE得分之间的最终关联,作为特定胜任力的客观,标准化度量,还进行了医学知识(MK)。结果:有37位居民(PGY1-5)可获得结果。 ICS评分与MK(r = 0.52,p = 0.004),PR(r = 0.826,p <0.0001)和患者护理(PC)(r = 0.619,p <0.0001)的较高评分之间存在显着相关性。然而,在住院病人的评价与他们的基于教师/同伴的ICS评分之间没有发现相关性。我们发现ICS评分与改善的患者评估之间没有关联。最后,我们发现ICS或MK分数与ABSITE分数之间没有关联。结论:由于晕圈效应,评估完成不当,或者这些居民在临床上是否真正表现更好,很难确定ICS分数较高的居民是否具有较高的PR,PC和MK分数。居民绩效的外部衡量与ICS和PR的教师/同伴评估没有关联。居留计划应考虑采用更为标准化的方式来客观地评估居民。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号