...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing: official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society >Statistical hypothesis testing: motivation and methods for the comparison of means between 2 patient samples.
【24h】

Statistical hypothesis testing: motivation and methods for the comparison of means between 2 patient samples.

机译:统计假设检验:2个患者样本之间进行均值比较的动机和方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The logic behind statistical reasoning may appear to proceed in the opposite direction from scientific reasoning. Thus, understanding and interpreting statistical tests and their conclusions may be counterintuitive for many researchers and WOC nurses. For example, scientists often reason deductively and aggressively: "I hypothesize that there is a difference between treatment A and treatment B, and I will collect data to prove it." Statisticians think inductively and defensively: "The data show some difference between treatment A and treatment B, but is it enough evidence to conclude that a no-difference hypothesis is wrong?" A statistical hypothesis test is a method for quantifying how much evidence constitutes "enough." In this article, we will outline the motivation for statistical hypothesis testing, and discuss specific examples for 2-sample testing in the context of WOC nursing. This is the first in a series of 6 articles; subsequent articles will cover other types of statistical tests. To set the stage for 2-sample testing (eg, the comparison of 2 treatment groups), consider these examples:
机译:统计推理背后的逻辑似乎与科学推理相反。因此,对于许多研究人员和WOC护士来说,理解和解释统计检验及其结论可能是违反直觉的。例如,科学家经常会演绎性和积极性地进行推理:“我假设治疗A和治疗B之间存在差异,我将收集数据来证明这一点。”统计学家对此进行了归纳和防御性思考:“数据显示出治疗A和治疗B之间存在一些差异,但是是否有足够的证据得出无差异假设是错误的结论呢?”统计假设检验是一种量化多少证据构成“足够”的方法。在本文中,我们将概述统计假设检验的动机,并讨论在WOC护理背景下进行2样本检验的具体示例。这是6篇文章系列中的第一篇;随后的文章将涵盖其他类型的统计检验。要设置进行2个样本测试的阶段(例如,比较2个治疗组),请考虑以下示例:

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号