首页> 外文期刊>Journal of research in nursing: JRN >Liberating the NHS: liberte,egalite, fraternite?
【24h】

Liberating the NHS: liberte,egalite, fraternite?

机译:解放NHS:自由主义者,平等主义者,方铅矿?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In recent weeks the Department of Health in the United Kingdom (UK) has published its white paper (Department of Health, 2010) announcing its commitment to introduce new arrangements for the commissioning of education and training of the healthcare workforce in the National Health Service (NHS). Whilst the paper itself contains little operational detail, as one might expect, there are sufficient outline proposals to stimulate the juices of even the most policy-averse health professional. The impacts of the white paper are far reaching and will certainly test the mettle of commissioners, providers, schools of healthcare and other providers of healthcare education. The historical differentiation and ring fencing of economic resources to support the education and professional development of pre-registration and post-qualification staff appears to be placed in a rather more free market scenario, with the possible inclusion of private universities and private companies tendering for business.
机译:最近几周,英国卫生部(UK)公布了其白皮书(Department of Health,2010),宣布致力于为国家卫生局(National Health Service)开展教育和培训医疗卫生人员的工作引入新的安排( NHS)。尽管该文件本身包含的操作细节很少,正如人们可能期望的那样,但有足够的大纲建议可以刺激甚至是最反对政策的卫生专业人员的工作。白皮书的影响是深远的,肯定会考验专员,提供者,医疗学校和其他医疗教育提供者的才能。用于支持注册前和资格后人员的教育和职业发展的经济资源的历史差异和围栏似乎处于一个更加自由的市场环境中,可能包括私立大学和私营公司竞标业务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号