...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of orthodontics >A comparison of three light curing units for bonding adhesive pre-coated brackets.
【24h】

A comparison of three light curing units for bonding adhesive pre-coated brackets.

机译:三种用于粘接预涂托架的光固化装置的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of three curing lights of different types. DESIGN: Prospective randomized laboratory investigations. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Adhesive pre-coated orthodontic brackets were bonded to 9 groups of extracted premolars and the adhesive was cured using three different curing lights, each at three different times. Bond strength was tested using a shear/peel method. RESULTS: The plasma light had 3 times the light intensity of the standard quartz halogen light. The curing times recommended by the manufacturers were 2 seconds for the plasma light, 10 seconds for the high intensity quartz halogen light and 20 seconds for the standard one. Mean debond stresses with these cure times were 9.36, 11.77 and 12.00 MPa, respectively, p<0.04. Increasing the plasma light cure to 4 seconds increased the mean debond stress to 11.19 MPa, similar to that for the other lights, p=0.62. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a plasma light confers worthwhile time savings when bonding orthodontic brackets, whilstproducing bonds of equivalent strength to those found with quartz halogen lights.
机译:目的:比较三种不同类型的固化灯的有效性。设计:前瞻性随机实验室研究。材料与方法:将胶粘剂预涂覆的正畸托槽粘结到9组拔出的前磨牙上,并使用三种不同的固化光在每次不同的三个时间固化胶粘剂。使用剪切/剥离方法测试粘合强度。结果:等离子光的强度是标准石英卤素灯的3倍。制造商建议的固化时间是等离子灯为2秒,高强度石英卤素灯为10秒,标准灯为20秒。在这些固化时间下的平均脱粘应力分别为9.36、11.77和12.00 MPa,p <0.04。将等离子光固化时间增加到4秒,将平均脱粘应力增加到11.19 MPa,这与其他光类似,p = 0.62。结论:等离子灯的使用在粘合正畸托槽时可节省大量时间,同时产生与石英卤素灯相同强度的粘合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号