首页> 外文期刊>Journal of research in medical sciences : >A Systematic Review on methods of evaluate sentence production deficits in agrammatic aphasia patients: Validity and Reliability issues
【24h】

A Systematic Review on methods of evaluate sentence production deficits in agrammatic aphasia patients: Validity and Reliability issues

机译:评估语法失语症患者句子产生缺陷的方法的系统评价:有效性和可靠性问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The grammar assessment in aphasia has been done by few standard tests, but today these tests cannot precise evaluate the sentence production in agrammatic patients. In this study, we review structures and contents of tests or tasks designed to find more frequent methods for sentence production ability in aphasia patients. Materials and Methods: We searched the Cochrane library, Medline by PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Google Scholar from 1980 to October 1, 2013 and evaluated all of exist tests or tasks included in the articles and systematic reviews. The sentence production has been studied in three methods. It contains the use of sentence production in spontaneous speech, tasks designed and both methods. The quality of studies was assessed using Critical Appraisal Skills Program. Results: The 160 articles were reviewed and 38 articles were studied according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were classified into three categories based on assessment methods of sentence production. In 39.5% studies, researchers have used tasks designed, 7.9% articles have applied spontaneous speech and 52.6% articles have used both methods for evaluation production. Inter-rater reliability was between 90% and 100% and intra-rater reliability was between 96% and 98% in studied. Conclusion: Agrammatic aphasia has syntax disorders, especially in sentence production. Most researchers and clinicians used both methods for evaluation production.
机译:背景:关于失语症的语法评估很少通过标准测试完成,但如今,这些测试无法精确评估语法障碍患者的句子产生能力。在这项研究中,我们审查了旨在发现失语症患者更常用的句子产生能力方法的测试或任务的结构和内容。资料和方法:我们搜索了1980年至2013年10月1日间Cochrane库,Medline by PubMed,Science Direct,Scopus和Google Scholar,并评估了本文和系统评价中包含的所有现有测试或任务。用三种方法研究了句子的产生。它包含在自发语音中使用句子生成,设计的任务以及这两种方法。研究质量使用关键评估技能计划进行评估。结果:根据纳入和排除标准,审查了160篇文章,研究了38篇文章。根据句子产生的评估方法将它们分为三类。在39.5%的研究中,研究人员使用了设计的任务,7.9%的文章采用了自发性语音,52.6%的文章使用了两种方法进行评估。评估者之间的信度在90%至100%之间,评估者内部的信度在96%至98%之间。结论:语法失语症有语法障碍,尤其是在句子产生方面。大多数研究人员和临床医生都使用两种方法进行评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号