首页> 外文期刊>Journal of interferon and cytokine research: The official journal of the International Society for Interferon and Cytokine Research >Diagnostic accuracy of ascitic fluid IFN-gamma and adenosine deaminase assays in the diagnosis of tuberculous ascites.
【24h】

Diagnostic accuracy of ascitic fluid IFN-gamma and adenosine deaminase assays in the diagnosis of tuberculous ascites.

机译:腹水IFN-γ和腺苷脱氨酶测定在结核性腹水诊断中的诊断准确性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of ascitic fluid interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and adenosine deaminase (ADA) assays in the diagnosis of tuberculous ascites. Ascitic fluid from patients with proven tuberculosis (TB) (n = 31) and non-TB ascites (n = 88) was analyzed for IFN-gamma and ADA levels. Areas under the receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs) for the two biologic markers were compared. Levels of ascitic fluid IFN-gamma, median (range): 560 (104-1600) pg/mL vs. 4.85 (0-320) pg/mL (p < 0.001), and ADA, median (range): 58 (16-331) IU/L vs. 10 (0-59) IU/L (p = 0.001), were significantly different between TB and non-TB groups. IFN-gamma and ADA assays showed equal sensitivity (0.97) and differed marginally in specificity (0.97 vs. 0.94). Difference in AUCs was not significant (0.99 vs. 0.98, p < 0.62). For differentiating TB from non-TB ascites, optimal cutoff points were 112 pg/mL for IFN-gamma and 37 IU/L for ADA. The accuracy of the ADA assay was similar to that of the IFN-gamma assay in differentiating of TB from non-TB ascites. Because both material and human costs of the ADA assay are far less than those of the IFN-gamma assay, the former is probably the most appropriate diagnostic test for analysis of peritoneal fluid in resource- limited settings.
机译:在这项研究中,我们评估了腹水干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)和腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)检测法在结核性腹水诊断中的诊断准确性和成本效益。分析了结核病(TB)(n = 31)和非结核性腹水(n = 88)患者的腹水的IFN-γ和ADA水平。比较了两种生物标志物的接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线(AUC)下的面积。腹水IFN-γ水平,中位数(范围):560(104-1600)pg / mL vs.4.85(0-320)pg / mL(p <0.001),以及ADA,中位数(范围):58(16 -331)IU / L与10(0-59)IU / L(p = 0.001)之间,结核病组与非结核病组之间存在显着差异。 IFN-γ和ADA测定显示出相同的灵敏度(0.97),并且在特异性上略有不同(0.97 vs. 0.94)。 AUC的差异不明显(0.99比0.98,p <0.62)。为了区分结核病与非结核性腹水,IFN-γ的最佳临界点为112 pg / mL,ADA的最佳临界点为37 IU / L。在区分结核病与非结核性腹水方面,ADA试验的准确性与IFN-γ试验相似。由于ADA分析的材料和人力成本均远低于IFN-γ分析的成本,因此前者可能是在资源有限的情况下分析腹膜液的最合适的诊断测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号