...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews >Critical review of oral drug treatments for diabetic neuropathic pain-clinical outcomes based on efficacy and safety data from placebo-controlled and direct comparative studies.
【24h】

Critical review of oral drug treatments for diabetic neuropathic pain-clinical outcomes based on efficacy and safety data from placebo-controlled and direct comparative studies.

机译:根据来自安慰剂对照和直接比较研究的功效和安全性数据,对口服药物治疗糖尿病性神经性疼痛-临床结局进行了严格的审查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The present review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a selection of oral treatments for the management of painful diabetic neuropathy. A literature review was conducted retrieving placebo-controlled and direct comparative studies with a selection of oral treatments for painful diabetic neuropathy. All studies were analyzed with regard to efficacy and tolerability. Efficacy was evaluated as the percentage improvement in pain intensity between baseline and endpoint. Tolerability was evaluated by means of study discontinuations due to adverse events and by incidence of drug-related adverse events.The analyzed trials enrolled different patient populations with mostly small numbers of patients. The great variability in dosages and dose titration schemes, cross-over designs with variable wash-out periods, and other design schemes made comparison between the different studies difficult. Gabapentin, lamotrigine, tramadol, oxycodone, mexiletine, and acetyl-L-carnitine were the only treatments studied in large (at least 100 patients), placebo-controlled parallel group trials.It is concluded that standardization in design and reporting for comparison of treatments is needed. Validated questionnaires for evaluation of the efficacy and safety should be further developed. Based on the reviewed randomised controlled trials, gabapentin shows good efficacy, a favourable side-effect profile with lack of drug interactions and therefore it may be a first choice treatment in painful diabetic neuropathy, especially in the elderly. However, head to head trials of current treatments are lacking and therefore randomized controlled trials are required to address this issue. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:本综述旨在评估选择口服治疗疼痛性糖尿病性神经病的疗效和安全性。进行了文献综述,检索了安慰剂对照和直接的比较研究,并选择了口服治疗糖尿病性神经病变的药物。分析所有研究的有效性和耐受性。评估疗效为基线和终点之间疼痛强度改善的百分比。通过因不良事件而终止研究以及药物相关不良事件的发生率来评估耐受性。分析的试验纳入了不同患者群体,其中大多数患者为少数。剂量和剂量滴定方案,具有可变洗脱期的交叉设计以及其他设计方案的巨大差异使得不同研究之间的比较变得困难。加巴喷丁,拉莫三嗪,曲马多,羟考酮,美西律和乙酰基左旋肉碱是在安慰剂对照的大型平行试验中(至少100例)进行的仅有的研究,结论是设计和报告标准化用于比较治疗是必需的。应进一步开发经过验证的用于评估疗效和安全性的问卷。根据回顾性随机对照试验,加巴喷丁显示出良好的疗效,良好的副作用且缺乏药物相互作用,因此,它可能是糖尿病性神经病变(尤其是老年人)的首选治疗方法。但是,目前的治疗尚缺乏面对面的试验,因此需要随机对照试验来解决这个问题。版权所有(c)2005 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号