首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes technology & therapeutics >A Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Therapy Evaluating Sitagliptin Versus Glibenclamide in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Already Treated with Pioglitazone and Metformin: A 3-Year Study
【24h】

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Therapy Evaluating Sitagliptin Versus Glibenclamide in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Already Treated with Pioglitazone and Metformin: A 3-Year Study

机译:评价已经使用吡格列酮和二甲双胍治疗的2型糖尿病患者西格列汀与格列本脲的随机,双盲,比较疗法:一项为期3年的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: This study evaluated if triple oral therapy can be useful in improving glycemic control compared with metformin monotherapy and with a metformin and pioglitazone combination. Furthermore, we also compared a triple metformin+ pioglitazone + glibenclamide combination with a metformin+pioglitazone + sitagliptin one. Subjects and Methods: After a 2-year run-in therapy-augmenting phase with metformin and pioglitazone, 453 overweight, type 2 diabetes patients were randomized to 1 year of sitagliptin versus 1 year of glibenclamide to evaluate, as the primary outcome, the variation of beta-cell function both in a fasting state and after an euglycemic hyperinsulinemic and hyperglycemic clamp. As secondary outcomes we evaluated glycemic control and insulin resistance. Results: Both the triple therapy combinations were more effective in reducing glycated hemoglobin compared with metformin monotherapy and with dual therapy metformin+pioglitazone. Fasting plasma insulin level and the homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance index were significantly increased by triple therapy with glibenclamide and decreased by the one with sitagliptin. Although sitagliptin did not change the homeostasis model assessment beta-function index, this value was significantly increased by glibenclamide. The fasting plasma proinsulin level was decreased by sitagliptin. Triple therapy with sitagliptin greatly improved beta-cell function measures compared with the glibenclamide one and also compared with metformin monotherapy and with the metformin+pioglitazone combination. Conclusions: Dual combination therapy is more effective than monotherapy in improving glycemic control. When double therapy is not enough to reach an adequate glycemic control, sitagliptin should be preferred to glibenclamide as the third agent because of its positive effect on beta-cells.
机译:目的:本研究评估了三重口服疗法与二甲双胍单一疗法以及二甲双胍和吡格列酮联合治疗是否可用于改善血糖控制。此外,我们还比较了三甲双胍+吡格列酮+格列本脲与二甲双胍+吡格列酮+西他列汀的组合。研究对象和方法:经过2年的二甲双胍和吡格列酮强化治疗阶段,将453名超重2型糖尿病患者随机分为西格列汀1年和格列本脲1年,以评估其主要结果在禁食状态以及正常血糖高胰岛素和高血糖钳夹后的β细胞功能的变化。作为次要结果,我们评估了血糖控制和胰岛素抵抗。结果:与二甲双胍单一疗法和二甲双胍+吡格列酮双重疗法相比,两种三联疗法在减少糖化血红蛋白方面更有效。空腹血浆胰岛素水平和稳态模型评估胰岛素抵抗指数通过格列本脲三联疗法显着升高,而西他列汀组则降低。尽管西他列汀未改变体内稳态模型评估的β功能指数,但格列本脲显着增加了该值。西他列汀可降低空腹血浆胰岛素原水平。与格列本脲相比,西他列汀的三联疗法极大地改善了β细胞功能,与二甲双胍单药疗法和二甲双胍+吡格列酮联合疗法相比。结论:双重联合疗法在改善血糖控制方面比单一疗法更有效。当双重疗法不足以达到足够的血糖控制时,西他列汀应优先于格列本脲作为第三种药物,因为它对β细胞具有积极作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号