首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes technology & therapeutics >A comparison of the handling and accuracy of syringe and vial versus prefilled insulin pen (FlexPen).
【24h】

A comparison of the handling and accuracy of syringe and vial versus prefilled insulin pen (FlexPen).

机译:注射器和小瓶与预装胰岛素笔(FlexPen)的处理和准确性的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: To determine the preferable method for self-injecting insulin, we compared the handling, safety, and dose accuracy of a conventional disposable syringe and vial with FlexPen (Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark), a prefilled pen. METHODS: Insulin therapy-naive healthcare professionals (HCPs) (n = 30), unfamiliar with insulin delivery, injected 10 U of insulin into a sponge pad using either a syringe and vial or the FlexPen, both with 30-gauge 8-mm needles, on day 1. The following day, they used the alternative method. They evaluated the handling of the two methods on device-specific questionnaires and compared overall preference on a third questionnaire. To evaluate dose accuracy, 30 insulin therapy-experienced HCPs and 20 insulin therapy-naive HCPs were asked to deliver 10 U of insulin using each method, and the amount discharged was weighed. RESULTS: FlexPen was rated easier to use and overall more preferable than the syringe and vial by insulin therapy-naive HCPs (P < 0.001). The pen device was more accurate than the syringe and vial when used by experienced HCPs (mean +/- SD dose delivered, 9.91 +/- 0.11 U vs. 9.82 +/- 0.25 U, respectively; P < 0.001) and by insulin therapy-naive HCPs (9.91 +/- 0.12 U vs. 9.74 +/- 0.85 U; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Insulin therapy-naive HCPs found FlexPen easier to handle and preferable to use compared to a conventional syringe and vial. Both insulin therapy-experienced and -naive HCPs were able to deliver insulin significantly more accurately with the FlexPen than with a syringe and vial (P < 0.001).
机译:背景:为确定自动注射胰岛素的最佳方法,我们将传统的一次性注射器和小瓶与预装笔头FlexPen(Novo Nordisk A / S,Bagsvaerd,丹麦)的处理,安全性和剂量准确性进行了比较。方法:不熟悉胰岛素治疗的未使用胰岛素治疗的专业医护人员(n = 30),使用注射器和小瓶或FlexPen(均带有30号8毫米针头)向海绵垫注射10 U胰岛素。 ,在第1天。第二天,他们使用了替代方法。他们评估了针对特定设备的调查表对这两种方法的处理方式,并比较了第三份调查表的总体偏好。为了评估剂量准确性,使用每种方法要求30位接受过胰岛素治疗的HCP和20位未接受过胰岛素治疗的HCP输送10 U胰岛素,并称量排出量。结果:未经胰岛素治疗的HCP对FlexPen的评价为比注射器和小瓶更易于使用,总体上更可取(P <0.001)。当由经验丰富的HCP使用时,笔式设备比注射器和小瓶更精确(平均+/- SD剂量,分别为9.91 +/- 0.11 U和9.82 +/- 0.25 U; P <0.001)和胰岛素治疗天真HCP(9.91 +/- 0.12 U与9.74 +/- 0.85 U; P <0.001)。结论:与常规注射器和小瓶相比,未经胰岛素治疗的HCP发现FlexPen更易于操作,更可取。经历过胰岛素治疗的HCP和未接受过HCP的HCP都能比使用注射器和小瓶显着更准确地递送胰岛素(P <0.001)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号