首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes technology & therapeutics >Clinical performance of three bolus calculators in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a head-to-head-to-head comparison.
【24h】

Clinical performance of three bolus calculators in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a head-to-head-to-head comparison.

机译:三种推注计算器在1型糖尿病患者中的临床表现:头对头比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Insulin pump systems now provide automated bolus calculators (ABCs) that electronically calculate insulin boluses to address carbohydrate intake and out-of-range blood glucose (bG) levels. We compared the efficacy of three ABCs (Accu-Chek((R)) Combo [Roche Insulin Delivery Systems (IDS), Inc., Fishers, IN, a member of the Roche Group], Animas((R)) 2020 [Animas Corp., West Chester, PA, a Johnson and Johnson company], and MiniMed Paradigm Bolus Wizard((R)) [Medtronic MiniMed, Northridge, CA]) to safely reduce postprandial hyperglycemia in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). METHODS: T1DM subjects (n = 24) were recruited at a single center for a prospective, triple crossover study. ABCs with the programmed target range (80-140 mg/dL) were used in random order. Postprandial hyperglycemia was induced by reducing the calculated bolus by 25%. Two hours after test meals, the ABCs were allowed to determine whether a correction bolus was needed. Differences between 6-h bG values after test meals that achieved 2-h postprandial hyperglycemia and the mean of the target range (110 mg/dL) were determined. RESULTS: The mean difference between 6-h bG levels following test meals and the 110 mg/dL bG target with the MiniMed device (47.4 +/- 31.8 mg/dL) was significantly higher than the Animas (17.3 +/- 30.9 mg/dL) and Roche IDS (18.8 +/- 33.8 mg/dL) devices (P = 0.0022 and P = 0.0049, respectively). The number of meals with 2-h postprandial hyperglycemia and bG levels at 2 h was similar. Roche IDS and Animas devices recommended correction boluses significantly (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0002, respectively) more frequently than the MiniMed device. ABC use was not associated with severe hypoglycemia. There was no significant difference in the rate of mild hypoglycemia (bG <60 mg/dL not requiring assistance) among the three groups (Roche IDS and Animas, n = 2; MiniMed, n = 0). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the Roche IDS and Animas devices were more efficacious in controlling postprandial hyperglycemia than the MiniMed device. This may be due, in part, to differences in ABC setup protocols and algorithms. Use of ABCs can assist in controlling postprandial glycemia without significant hypoglycemia.
机译:背景技术:胰岛素泵系统现在提供了自动推注计算器(ABC),可自动计算胰岛素推注,以解决碳水化合物的摄入和血糖超标(bG)的水平。我们比较了三种ABC(Accu-Chek(R)组合[Roche胰岛素输送系统(IDS),Inc.,Fishers,IN,Roche Group的成员),Animas(2020)[Animas Corp.,宾夕法尼亚州西切斯特市(Johnson and Johnson公司)和MiniMed Paradigm Bolus Wizard(R)[Medtronic MiniMed,Northridge,CA])可安全地降低1型糖尿病(T1DM)的餐后高血糖。方法:在单个中心招募T1DM受试者(n = 24)进行前瞻性三重交叉研究。具有随机设定目标范围(80-140 mg / dL)的ABC。通过将计算的推注量减少25%来诱发餐后高血糖。进餐两小时后,允许ABC来确定是否需要校正推注。测定达到餐后2小时高血糖的试验餐后6小时bG值与目标范围的平均值(110 mg / dL)之间的差异。结果:试验餐后6小时bG水平与MiniMed装置的110 mg / dL bG目标之间的平均差异(47.4 +/- 31.8 mg / dL)显着高于Animas(17.3 +/- 30.9 mg / dL)和Roche IDS(18.8 +/- 33.8 mg / dL)设备(分别为P = 0.0022和P = 0.0049)。餐后2小时高血糖和2小时bG水平的进餐次数相似。罗氏IDS和Animas设备建议比MiniMed设备更频繁地进行大剂量推注(分别为P = 0.0001和P = 0.0002)。使用ABC与严重的低血糖无关。三组(Roche IDS和Animas,n = 2; MiniMed,n = 0)之间的轻度低血糖发生率(bG <60 mg / dL,不需要帮助)没有显着差异。结论:在这项研究中,罗氏IDS和Animas设备在控制餐后高血糖方面比MiniMed设备更有效。这可能部分是由于ABC设置协议和算法的差异。使用ABC可帮助控制餐后血糖而无明显的低血糖。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号