首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Wildlife Management >Estimates of elk summer range nutritional carrying capacity constrained by probabilities of habitat selection.
【24h】

Estimates of elk summer range nutritional carrying capacity constrained by probabilities of habitat selection.

机译:估计麋鹿夏季范围内的营养承载力受生境选择概率的限制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We used habitat-selection data from a reintroduced population of elk (Cervus elaphus) in northeastern Nevada, USA, to develop a resource-selection function to adjust nutritional carrying capacity estimates. Constrained estimates provide population levels that minimize overuse of key foraging communities. We estimated economic nutritional carrying capacity (INCC) for 236-kg lactating cow elk in autumn 1999 and 2000 to reflect expected animal performance under maintenance (2,550 kcal/kg DM) and good (2,750 kcal/kg DM) levels of standing digestible energy. We used our resource-selection function to redistribute INCC densities (RSFD) for aspen (Populus tremuloides), conifer, curl-leaf mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus ledifolius), sagebrush (Artemisia spp.)-herb, and snowbrush ceanothus (Ceanothus velutinus) cover types across the summer range and then adjusted original INCC estimates according to these RSFD when expected densities exceeded original INCC estimates. Maintenance performance INCC estimates were 2,533 cow elk (95% CI: 1,327-3,739) in 1999 and 1,655 (95% CI: 886-2,424) in 2000. Good performance INCC estimates were 2,264 cow elk (95% CI: 1,150-3,378) in 1999 and 1,100 (95% CI: 384-1,816) in 2000. The best habitat model provided evidence that forage availability and distance to water influenced habitat selection. Adjustments in INCC for 1999 and 2000 and at both performance levels corresponded to decreases of 18-35% in original INCC estimates. Decreases were attributed to more cow elk predicted by RSFD to be in aspen, conifer, and sagebrush-herb cover types than predicted by INCC. Each year, RSFD predicted that fewer elk would use mahogany and snowbrush cover types than original INCC models. The adjusted carrying capacity estimates provided population levels that should avoid appreciable alteration of aspen, conifer, and sagebrush-herb communities while ensuring nutritious resources during lean periods. Our paper provides a critical refinement for nutritional carrying capacity models through incorporating prediction of animal selection of nutritional resources..
机译:我们使用了来自美国内华达州东北部重新引入的麋鹿(鹿)的栖息地选择数据,以开发资源选择功能来调整营养承载力估计。受约束的估计数可提供最大程度减少关键觅食社区过度使用的人口水平。我们估算了1999年和2000年秋季236千克泌乳牛麋的经济营养承载力(INCC),以反映在维持水平(2,550 kcal / kg DM)和良好(2,750 kcal / kg DM)固定可消化能量水平下的预期动物性能。我们使用资源选择功能重新分配了白杨(Populus tremuloides),针叶树,卷叶山桃花心木(Cercocarpus ledifolius),鼠尾草(Artemisia spp。)-草和雪松犀草(Ceanothus velutinus)的INCC密度(RSFD)类型,然后在预期密度超过原始INCC估计值时,根据这些RSFD调整原始INCC估计值。维护性能INCC的估计值为1999年的2,533头麋鹿(95%CI:1,327-3,739)和2000年的1,655(95%的CI:886-2,424)。良好的INCC估计值为2,264的麋鹿(95%CI:1,150-3,378)最好的生境模型提供了证据,证明草料的可利用性和距水的距离会影响生境的选择,1999年为1,100(95%CI:384-1,816)。 1999年和2000年INCC的调整以及两个绩效水平的调整对应于INCC原始估算的减少18-35%。减少归因于RSFD预测的白杨,针叶树和鼠尾草-草覆盖类型的牛麋比INCC预测的要多。 RSFD每年预测,与原始INCC模型相比,使用桃花心木和雪刷套类型的麋鹿会更少。调整后的承载力估算值可提供人口水平,应避免白杨,针叶树和鼠尾草-草本植物群落发生明显变化,同时确保在贫瘠时期营养丰富的资源。通过结合动物对营养资源选择的预测,我们的论文为营养承载力模型提供了重要的改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号