...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal Of The South African Institute Of Mining & Metallurgy >Bankers' perspective of mining project finance
【24h】

Bankers' perspective of mining project finance

机译:银行家对采矿项目融资的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Since the dismal performance of the Rand Mines management was called to account by its shareholders in 1994, the waves of change have continued to ripple across the South African ruining industry. The number of listings on the gold board of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, that once numbered 40 or 50-odd, have now dwindled to no more than a handful as unprecedented restructuring has taken place. The redefining of the industry has not been limited to the gold sector, but across the base metal, coal, diamond, platinum and industrial mineral sectors as well.At the same time the Mining Houses began to reconsider their funding strategies. Originally established in the early part of the century to ensure the long-term sustainability of their group mining operations by providing substantial financial muscle and technical support, the Mining Houses were faced with a rapidly changing political environment, which proved to be a critical catalyst in giving momentum to the change. Furthermore, the significant development costs and increasing risk profile for new projects, coupled with pressure from shareholders demanding respectable returns, opened the door to opportunities for banks to begin providing external debt by the way of project finance. However, the provision of long-term debt to the South African mining industry had generally not been common since mining companies had financed new projects with equity, or with the cash flows from existing operations.Those banks that had the appetite for exposure to the perceived high risks of the mining sector rapidly built up specialist resource banking divisions capable of addressing the increasing demands of the industry. The application of project finance, the principles of which were developed in the 1970s specifically for infrastructure projects and privatization, is now commonly applied in the financing of greenfield and brownfield mining projects.This paper outlines the approach that lending banks would typically adopt when arranging or providing ruining project finance, their usual areas of concern and the way in which the finance is structured to mitigate the many inherent risks.
机译:自1994年Rand Mines管理层的股东业绩低迷以来,变革的浪潮一直在整个南非破坏行业中荡漾。约翰内斯堡证券交易所黄金交易所的挂牌数量一度达到40或50倍,但由于进行了前所未有的重组,如今已减少到不多。行业的重新定义不仅限于黄金行业,还涵盖了贱金属,煤炭,钻石,铂金和工业矿产行业。与此同时,矿业公司开始重新考虑其融资策略。最初建立于本世纪初,是为了通过提供大量资金和技术支持来确保集团采矿业务的长期可持续性,采矿公司面临着瞬息万变的政治环境,事实证明,采矿环境是矿业发展的关键催化剂。推动变革。此外,新项目的巨大开发成本和不断增加的风险状况,再加上股东要求获得可观回报的压力,为银行提供了通过项目融资方式开始提供外债的机会之门。但是,向南非采矿业提供长期债务通常并不常见,因为采矿公司是通过股权或现有业务的现金流量为新项目提供资金的。采矿业的高风险迅速建立了专门的资源银行部门,能够满足该行业不断增长的需求。项目融资的应用原理是在1970年代专门为基础设施项目和私有化开发的,现在已广泛用于新建和棕色开发项目的融资。提供破坏性的项目融资,其通常关注的领域以及融资结构以减轻许多固有风险的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号