首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >Sustainabiisty of Qualify Improvement Following Removal of Pay-for-Performance Incentives
【24h】

Sustainabiisty of Qualify Improvement Following Removal of Pay-for-Performance Incentives

机译:取消按绩效报酬的激励措施后的资格提升的可持续性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Although pay-for-performance (P4P) has become a central strategy for improving quality in US healthcare, questions persist about the effectiveness of these programs. A key question is whether quality improvement that occurs as a result of P4P programs is sustainable, particularly if incentives are removed. OBJECTIVE: To investigate sustainability of performance levels following removal of performance-based incentives.DESfGJV, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational cohort study that capitalized on a P4P program within the Veterans Health Administration (VA) that included adoption and subsequent removal of performance-based incentives for selected inpatient quality measures. The study sample comprised 128 acute care VA hospitals where performance was assessed between 2004 and 2010.INTERVENTION: VA system managers set annual performance goals in consultation with clinical leaders, and report performance scores to medical centers on a quarterly basis. These scores inform performance-based incentives for facilities and their managers. Bonuses are distributed based on the attainment of these performance goals.MEASUREMENTS: Seven quality of care measures for acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, and pneumonia linked to performance-based incentives. RESULTS: Significant improvements in performance were observed for six of seven quality of care measures following adoption of performance-based incentives and were maintained up to the removal of the incentive; subsequently, the observed performance levels were sustained.LIMITATIONS: This is a quasi-experimental study without a comparison group; causal conclusions are limited. CONCLUSION: The maintenance of performance levels after removal of a performance-based incentive has implications for the implementation of Medicare's value-based purchasing initiative and other P4P programs. Additional research is needed to better understand human and system-level factors that mediate sustainability of performance-based incentives.
机译:背景:尽管按绩效付费(P4P)已成为提高美国医疗保健质量的主要策略,但有关这些计划的有效性仍存在疑问。一个关键的问题是,P4P计划带来的质量改进是否可持续,特别是如果取消激励措施。目的:调查在取消基于绩效的激励措施后绩效水平的可持续性.DESfGJV,机构和参与者:观察性队列研究利用了退伍军人卫生管理局(VA)的P4P计划,包括采用和随后取消基于绩效的鼓励选择住院质量措施。该研究样本包括128所急诊VA医院,在2004年至2010年之间对其绩效进行了评估。干预措施:VA系统经理与临床负责人协商后制定了年度绩效目标,并每季度向医疗中心报告绩效得分。这些分数为设施及其管理人员提供了基于绩效的激励措施。根据实现这些绩效目标来分配奖金。措施:与基于绩效的奖励措施相关的急性冠脉综合征,心力衰竭和肺炎的七种护理措施质量。结果:在采用基于绩效的激励措施后,七项护理质量措施中有六项的绩效得到了显着改善,并一直维持到取消激励措施为止。局限性:这是一项准实验研究,没有对照组。因果结论是有限的。结论:取消基于绩效的激励措施后维持绩效水平对实施Medicare基于价值的购买计划和其他P4P计划具有影响。需要进行更多的研究,以更好地理解可调节基于绩效的激励措施可持续性的人员和系统级因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号