首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >Behaviorally defined patient-centered communication--a narrative review of the literature.
【24h】

Behaviorally defined patient-centered communication--a narrative review of the literature.

机译:以行为为中心的以患者为中心的交流-文献叙事回顾。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Touted by some as reflecting a better medical model and cited by the influential IOM report in 2000 as one of the six domains of quality care, patient-centered medicine has yet to fully establish its scientific attributes or to become mainstream. One proposed reason is failure to behaviorally define what the term 'patient-centered' actually means. OBJECTIVES: (1) To identify patient-centered articles among all reported randomized controlled trials (RCT); (2) to identify those with specific behaviorally defined interventions; (3) to identify commonalities among the behavioral definitions; and (4) to evaluate the relationship of the well-defined RCTs to patient outcomes. DATA SOURCES: Medline from April 2010 to 1975. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: RCTs having any specific, behaviorally defined patient-centered skill(s) in an intervention with some patient outcome involving real adult patients and providers in real clinical situations. APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Critical appraisal via narrative review. RESULTS: The prevalence of any mention of patient-centeredness among 327,219 RCTs was 0.50% (1,475 studies), from which we identified only 13 studies (0.90%) where there were behaviorally-defined patient-centered skills in an intervention. Although there were too few studies to make clinical recommendations, we identified common features of the behavioral definitions used: all went well beyond identifying individual skills. Rather, skills were grouped, prioritized, and sequenced by virtually all, often describing a stepwise patient-centered approach to, variously, gather data, address emotions, or inform and motivate. LIMITATIONS: The inherent subjectivity of our method for identifying behaviorally-defined studies could under- or over-represent truly replicable such studies considerably. Also, studies were few and very heterogeneous with interventions of widely differing intensity and foci. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: RCTs identified as patient-centered were rare, and <1% of these were behaviorally defined and, therefore, possibly replicable. There were many common behavioral definitions in the studies reported, and these can guide us in identifying agreed-upon patient-centered interventions, the immediate next-step in advancing the field.
机译:背景:以患者为中心的医学尚未得到充分确立其科学属性或成为主流,它被一些人吹捧为反映更好的医学模型,并在2000年有影响力的IOM报告中被引用为高质量护理的六个领域之一。一个提出的原因是未能从行为上定义“以患者为中心”一词的实际含义。目的:(1)在所有报告的随机对照试验(RCT)中确定以患者为中心的文章; (2)找出具有特定行为定义干预措施的人员; (3)识别行为定义之间的共性; (4)评估定义明确的RCT与患者预后的关系。数据来源:Medline,2010年4月至1975年。资格标准,参与者和干预措施:RCT在干预中具有任何特定的,以行为定义的以患者为中心的技能,某些患者的治疗结果涉及真正的成人患者和实际临床情况的提供者。评估和综合方法:通过叙述性评论进行批判性评估。结果:327,219例RCT中,任何提及以患者为中心的患病率为0.50%(1,475项研究),我们从其中仅发现13项(0.90%)研究中,这些研究中存在以行为为中心的以患者为中心的技能。尽管很少有研究提出临床建议,但我们确定了所用行为定义的共同特征:所有这些都超出了确定个人技能的范围。实际上,技能是由几乎所有人员进行分组,确定优先级和排序的,它们通常描述一种以患者为中心的逐步方法,以各种方式收集数据,解决情绪或提供信息和激励。局限性:我们用来确定行为定义的研究的方法的固有主观性可能严重不足或过度代表了此类研究。而且,对于强度和病灶差异很大的干预措施,研究很少而且非常不同。结论和意义:被确定为以患者为中心的RCT很少见,其中少于1%是行为定义的,因此可能是可复制的。报告的研究中有许多常见的行为定义,这些定义可以指导我们确定以患者为中心的商定干预措施,这是推进该领域的直接下一步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号