...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >Failure to intensify antihypertensive treatment by primary care providers: a cohort study in adults with diabetes mellitus and hypertension.
【24h】

Failure to intensify antihypertensive treatment by primary care providers: a cohort study in adults with diabetes mellitus and hypertension.

机译:初级保健人员未能加强降压治疗:一项针对成年人糖尿病和高血压的队列研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Although tight blood pressure control is crucial in reducing vascular complications of diabetes, primary care providers often fail to appropriately intensify antihypertensive medications. OBJECTIVE: To identify novel visit-based factors associated with intensification of antihypertensive medications in adults with diabetes. DESIGN: Non-concurrent prospective cohort study. PATIENTS: A total of 254 patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension enrolled in an academically affiliated managed care program. Over a 24-month interval (1999-2001), we identified 1,374 visits at which blood pressure was suboptimally controlled (systolic BP >/= 140 mmHg or diastolic BP >/= 90 mmHg). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intensification of antihypertensive medications at each visit was the primary outcome. Primary care providers intensified antihypertensive treatment in only 176 (13%) of 1,374 visits at which blood pressure was elevated. As expected, higher mean systolic and mean diastolic blood pressures were important predictors of intensification. Treatment was also more likely to be intensified at visits that were "routine" odds ratio (OR) 2.08; 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI] 1.36-3.18), or that paired patients with their usual primary care provider (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.11-3.06). In contrast, several factors were associated with failure to intensify treatment, including capillary glucose >150 mg/dL (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.31-0.94) and the presence of coronary heart disease (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.38-0.95). Co-management by a cardiologist accounted partly for this failure (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.41-1.03). CONCLUSIONS: Failure to appropriately intensify antihypertensive treatment is common in diabetes care. Clinical distractions and shortcomings in continuity and coordination of care are possible targets for improvement.
机译:背景:尽管严格的血压控制对于减少糖尿病的血管并发症至关重要,但是初级保健提供者通常无法适当地加强抗高血压药物的治疗。目的:确定与成年糖尿病患者降压药物治疗相关的新的基于访视的因素。设计:非并行前瞻性队列研究。患者:共有254名2型糖尿病和高血压患者参加了一个学术附属管理治疗计划。在24个月的时间间隔(1999-2001年)中,我们确定了1,374次就诊时血压未达到最佳控制水平(收缩压BP> / = 140 mmHg或舒张压BP> / = 90 mmHg)。测量和主要结果:每次就诊时加强抗高血压药物的治疗是主要结果。初级保健提供者在1,374次血压升高的就诊中仅176次(13%)加强了降压治疗。如预期的那样,较高的平均收缩压和平均舒张压是强化的重要预测指标。在“常规”比值比(OR)为2.08的就诊时,也更有可能加强治疗。 95%置信区间[95%CI] 1.36-3.18),或将患者与通常的初级保健提供者配对(OR 1.84; 95%CI 1.11-3.06)。相比之下,一些因素未能加强治疗,包括毛细血管葡萄糖> 150 mg / dL(OR 0.54; 95%CI 0.31-0.94)和存在冠心病(OR 0.61; 95%CI 0.38-0.95)。 。心脏科医生的共同管理部分归因于该失败(OR 0.65; 95%CI 0.41-1.03)。结论:在糖尿病护理中,未能适当加强抗高血压治疗是很常见的。临床注意力和连续性与协调性的不足可能是改善的目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号