...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >Factors associated with intensification of oral diabetes medications in primary care provider-patient dyads: a cohort study.
【24h】

Factors associated with intensification of oral diabetes medications in primary care provider-patient dyads: a cohort study.

机译:与基层医疗服务提供者-患者二联症中口服糖尿病药物使用强度增加相关的因素:一项队列研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Although suboptimal glycemic control is known to be common in diabetic adults, few studies have evaluated factors at the level of the physician-patient encounter. Our objective was to identify novel visit-based factors associated with intensification of oral diabetes medications in diabetic adults. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a nonconcurrent prospective cohort study of 121 patients with type 2 diabetes and hyperglycemia (A1C > or =8%) enrolled in an academically affiliated managed-care program. Over a 24-month interval (1999-2001), we identified 574 hyperglycemic visits. We measured treatment intensification and factors associated with intensification at each visit. RESULTS: Provider-patient dyads intensified oral diabetes treatment in only 128 (22%) of 574 hyperglycemic visits. As expected, worse glycemia was an important predictor of intensification. Treatment was more likely to be intensified for patients with visits that were "routine" (odds ratio [OR] 2.55 [95% CI 1.49-4.38]), for patients taking two or more oral diabetes drugs (2.82 [1.74-4.56]), or for patients with longer intervals between visits (OR per 30 days 1.05 [1.00-1.10]). In contrast, patients with less recent A1C measurements (OR >30 days before the visit 0.53 [0.34-0.85]), patients with a higher number of prior visits (OR per prior visit 0.94 [0.88-1.00]), and African American patients (0.59 [0.35-1.00]) were less likely to have treatment intensified. CONCLUSIONS: Failure to intensify oral diabetes treatment is common in diabetes care. Quality improvement measures in type 2 diabetes should focus on overcoming inertia, improving continuity of care, and reducing racial disparities.
机译:目的:尽管在糖尿病成年人中常见的血糖控制欠佳是常见的,但很少有研究在医患接触水平上评估因素。我们的目标是确定与糖尿病成年人中口服糖尿病药物激增相关的新的基于访视的因素。研究设计和方法:我们进行了一项非同期的前瞻性队列研究,研究对象为121名2型糖尿病和高血糖(A1C>或= 8%)患者,该患者参加了与学术有关的托管治疗计划。在24个月的时间间隔(1999年至2001年)中,我们确定了574次高血糖就诊。我们测量了每次就诊时的治疗强度和与强度相关的因素。结果:574位高血糖就诊者中只有128位(22%)的服务提供者-二元组加强了口服糖尿病治疗。正如预期的那样,血糖升高是集约化的重要预测指标。对于“常规”就诊的患者,更有可能加强治疗(几率[OR] 2.55 [95%CI 1.49-4.38]),服用两种或两种以上口服糖尿病药物的患者(2.82 [1.74-4.56]) ,或两次就诊之间间隔较长的患者(每30天为1.05 [1.00-1.10]或)。相比之下,近期A1C测量值较低的患者(OR>访视前30天为0.53 [0.34-0.85]),先前访视次数较高的患者(OR每次访视为0.94 [0.88-1.00])和非裔美国人患者(0.59 [0.35-1.00])接受强化治疗的可能性较小。结论:未能加强口服糖尿病治疗在糖尿病护理中很常见。 2型糖尿病的质量改善措施应侧重于克服惯性,改善护理的连续性并减少种族差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号