...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >Improving physicians' knowledge of the costs of common medications and willingness to consider costs when prescribing.
【24h】

Improving physicians' knowledge of the costs of common medications and willingness to consider costs when prescribing.

机译:提高医师对常用药物成本的了解以及开处方时考虑成本的意愿。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of an educational intervention designed to improve physicians' knowledge of drug costs and foster willingness to consider costs when prescribing. DESIGN: Pre- and post-intervention evaluation, using physicians as their own controls. SETTING: Four teaching hospitals, affiliated with 2 residency programs, in New York City and northern New Jersey. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty-six internal medicine house officers and attendings evaluated the intervention (71% response rate). Of these, 109 had also participated in a pre-intervention survey. INTERVENTION: An interactive teaching conference and distribution of a pocket guide, which listed the average wholesale prices of over 100 medications commonly used in primary care MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We administered a written survey, before and 6 months after the intervention. Changes in attitudes and knowledge were assessed, using physicians as their own controls, with Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank tests. Eighty-five percent of respondents reported receiving the pocket guide and 46% reported attending 1 of the teaching conferences. Of those who received the pocket guide, nearly two thirds (62%) reported using it once a month or more, and more than half (54%) rated it as moderately or very useful. Compared to their baseline responses, physicians after the intervention were more likely to ask patients about their out-of-pocket drug costs (22% before vs 27% after; P <.01) and less likely to feel unaware of drug costs (78% before vs 72% after; P =.02). After the intervention, physicians also reported more concern about the cost of drugs when prescribing for patients with Medicare (58% before vs 72% after; P <.01) or no insurance (90% before vs 98% after; P <.01). Knowledge of the costs of 33 drugs was more accurate after the intervention than before (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Our brief educational intervention led to modest improvements in physicians' knowledge of medication costs and their willingness to consider costs when prescribing. Future research could incorporate more high-intensity strategies, such as outreach visits, and target specific prescribing behaviors.
机译:目的:确定旨在提高医师对药物成本的了解并培养在处方时考虑成本的意愿的教育干预措施的有效性。设计:干预前和干预后评估,以医生为自己的对照。地点:位于纽约市和新泽西州北部的四所教学医院,隶属于两个居住计划。参与者:146名内科医务人员和与会人员对干预进行了评估(71%的回应率)。其中,109人还参加了干预前调查。干预:一次互动式教学会议,并分发一份袖珍指南,其中列出了初级保健中常用的100多种药物的平均批发价格。测量和主要结果:我们在干预前和干预后6个月进行了书面调查。评估态度和知识的变化,并以医生作为他们自己的对照,并使用Wilcoxon配对对的符号秩检验。 85%的受访者表示收到了袖珍指南,46%的受访者表示参加了其中的一次教学会议。在收到袖珍指南的人中,将近三分之二(62%)表示每月使用一次或多次,而超过一半(54%)的人将其评为中度或非常有用。与基线反应相比,干预后的医生更有可能向患者询问自己的自付费药费用(之前为22%,之后为27%; P <.01),并且不太可能不了解药物费用(78之前的百分比,之后的72%; P = .02)。干预后,医生还报告说,在开具Medicare(开药前为58%,开药后为72%; P <.01)或没有保险(开药前为90%,开药后为98%; P <.01)时,患者对药物的成本更加担忧。 )。干预后对33种药物成本的了解比以前更准确(P <.05)。结论:我们简短的教育干预导致医师对用药成本的了解以及他们在开药时考虑用药的意愿有所改善。未来的研究可能会纳入更多的高强度策略,例如外展访问,并针对特定的处方行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号