...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Virological Methods >Analytical performance of several classical swine fever laboratory diagnostic techniques on live animals for detection of infection
【24h】

Analytical performance of several classical swine fever laboratory diagnostic techniques on live animals for detection of infection

机译:几种经典猪瘟实验室诊断技术对活体动物感染检测的分析性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The diagnostic properties of several assays on live animals were studied using data from different experiments. These experiments involved 128 classical swine fever virus (CSFV) infected pigs (weaner pigs, fatteners and sows). Since all pigs in the study were infected with CSFV, only the proportion of test positive results and the time until a test positive result is obtained were evaluated. The RT-nPCR detected the highest proportion of infected pigs (98.9%), whereas the Antigen ELISA gave the worst detection results (74.7%). Within the group of test positive animals, infection was detected earliest using the leukocyte count and latest using Antigen ELISA. Using the virus neutralisation test, antibodies against CSFV were detectable on average 7.6 days after the onset of viraemia in virus isolation in whole blood. Using survival analysis, the time until the first positive diagnosis and the proportion of detected animals were combined in one test. Results showed that RT-nPCR performed significantly better than either virus isolation in different blood fractions or antigen ELISA.
机译:使用来自不同实验的数据研究了几种测定法对活体动物的诊断特性。这些实验涉及128头经典猪瘟病毒(CSFV)感染的猪(断奶猪,育肥猪和母猪)。由于研究中的所有猪都感染了CSFV,因此仅评估了测试阳性结果的比例和直到获得测试阳性结果的时间。 RT-nPCR检测到感染猪的比例最高(98.9%),而抗原ELISA检测结果最差(74.7%)。在测试阳性动物组中,最早使用白细胞计数检测到感染,最近使用Antigen ELISA检测到感染。使用病毒中和试验,在全血中分离出病毒血症后,平均出现病毒感染后平均7.6天即可检测到抗CSFV抗体。使用生存分析,将一次首次阳性诊断之前的时间和检测到的动物的比例合并在一个测试中。结果表明,RT-nPCR的效果明显好于在不同血液级分中的病毒分离或抗原ELISA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号