首页> 外文期刊>Journal of viral hepatitis. >A health economic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of PEG IFN alpha-2a and ribavirin in patients with mild chronic hepatitis C.
【24h】

A health economic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of PEG IFN alpha-2a and ribavirin in patients with mild chronic hepatitis C.

机译:一种健康经济模型,用于评估PEG IFNα-2a和利巴韦林在轻度慢性丙型肝炎患者中的成本效益。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

According to the current guidelines, it is advised not to treat patients with mild chronic hepatitis C. However, discussions as to giving immediately a treatment (direct treatment) to these patients have started and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of such strategy is still unknown. The aim of this study was to estimate, in the health care payer perspective, the ICER of a direct treatment of patients with mild chronic hepatitis C in comparison with the strategy of monitoring these patients and treat them when the disease will progress to the state of moderate chronic hepatitis. The treatment assessed was the current standard treatment composed of pegylated interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin. At the beginning of the study, patients were aged 45. Long-term economic and clinical outcomes over a 30-year period were predicted using a Markov simulation model. Data were obtained from published literature. Monte Carlo simulations were used to determine 95% confidence intervals of results. The ICER of a direct treatment with PEG IFN alpha-2a and ribavirin is euro23 046/QALY (CI 95%euro3 882-euro42 392) for genotypes 1-4-5-6 and euro4 631/QALY (CI 95%euro797-euro7 881) for genotypes 2-3. Sensitivity analysis shows that it is only in extreme circumstances related to the utilities that the ICER for genotypes 1-4-5-6 is unacceptably high for the society (>euro50 000). Even though a direct treatment is more expensive, it gives the advantage of curing greater number of patients and of increasing quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), implying that such strategy is generally cost-effective at a threshold of euro50 000/QALY.
机译:根据当前指南,建议不要对轻度慢性丙型肝炎患者进行治疗。但是,有关立即对这些患者进行治疗(直接治疗)的讨论已经开始,这种策略的成本效益比(ICER)增加了仍然未知。这项研究的目的是,从医疗保健支付者的角度,估计轻度慢性丙型肝炎患者的直接治疗的ICER,与监测这些患者并在疾病进展到疾病进展时进行治疗的策略进行比较。中度慢性肝炎。评估的治疗是由聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a和利巴韦林组成的当前标准治疗。在研究开始时,患者年龄为45岁。使用马尔可夫模拟模型预测了30年期间的长期经济和临床结局。数据来自已发表的文献。蒙特卡洛模拟用于确定结果的95%置信区间。对于1-4-5-6基因型和PEG4IFN-α-2a和利巴韦林直接治疗的ICER为euro23 046 / QALY(CI 95%euro3 882-euro42 392)和euro4 631 / QALY(CI 95%euro797-euro7) 881)的基因型2-3。敏感性分析表明,只有在与公用事业有关的极端情况下,基因型1-4-5-6的ICER才是社会所无法接受的(> euro50000)。即使直接治疗更昂贵,它也具有治愈更多患者和提高质量调整生命年(QALYs)的优势,这意味着这种策略通常在50000欧元/ QALY的门槛下具有成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号