...
首页> 外文期刊>JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition. >Use of an Electromagnetic Device Compared With Chest X-ray to Confirm Nasogastric Feeding Tube Position in Critical Care
【24h】

Use of an Electromagnetic Device Compared With Chest X-ray to Confirm Nasogastric Feeding Tube Position in Critical Care

机译:与胸部X射线检查相比较使用电磁设备来确定重症监护中鼻饲管的位置

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Insertion of nasogastric feeding tubes (NGTs) is common in critical care. However, misplacement is frequent and can carry a significant morbidity. Current methods to confirm position of NGTs are not reliable in this setting. We retrospectively compared the position of NGTs using an electromagnetically guided nasogastric tube (e-NGT) with that demonstrated by chest x-ray (CXR), the proportion of lung placements avoided, and the time taken to establish enteral feeding. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational study undertaken in a tertiary referral, adult intensive care unit between February 2006 and November 2013. Patients were included if they had a radiologically confirmed NGT. All CXRs were independently reviewed by an intensivist to determine position, and a subset of patients had their e-NGT image independently reviewed for quality control. Statistical analysis was in the form of sensitivity and specificity and descriptive where indicated. Results: In total, 121 NGT placements in 113 patients were analyzed. We found a sensitivity of 98% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.9%-99.7%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 48.0%-100.0%) when using the e-NGT compared with CXR. In the subset of 51 independently reviewed e-NGT images, 9 lung placements were avoided. The mean (SD) time from e-NGT placement to CXR was 185 (264.4) minutes and to feeding was 404 (77.8) minutes. Conclusion: When placed by a dedicated team, e-NGT allowed immediate detection of tube misplacement. As such, if used as the sole method for determining NGT position, e-NGTs minimize feeding delay and the need for multiple CXRs with subsequent cost savings.
机译:背景:鼻胃饲管(NGT)的插入在重症监护中很常见。但是,放错位置很常见,并且会带来很大的发病率。在这种情况下,当前用于确定NGT位置的方法并不可靠。我们回顾性地比较了使用电磁引导鼻胃管(e-NGT)的NGT的位置与胸部X线(CXR)所显示的位置,避免的肺部放置比例以及建立肠内喂养所需的时间。方法:这是一项回顾性观察研究,于2006年2月至2013年11月之间在三级转诊成人重症监护病房进行。如果患者经放射学证实为NGT,则将其纳入研究。所有的CXR均由专科医生进行独立检查以确定位置,并且对一部分患者的e-NGT图像进行独立检查以进行质量控制。统计分析采用敏感性,特异性和描述性的形式。结果:总共对113例患者的121例NGT进行了分析。与CXR相比,使用e-NGT时,我们发现灵敏度为98%(95%置信区间[CI],93.9%-99.7%),特异性为100%(95%CI,48.0%-100.0%)。在51个独立检查的e-NGT图像的子集中,避免了9个肺部放置。从放置e-NGT到CXR的平均(SD)时间为185(264.4)分钟,到进食为404(77.8)分钟。结论:由专职团队放置时,e-NGT可以立即检测到管子放错位置。因此,如果将e-NGT用作确定NGT位置的唯一方法,则可以最大程度地减少进料延迟和对多个CXR的需求,从而节省成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号