首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >Bone quality: educational tools for patients, physicians, and educators.
【24h】

Bone quality: educational tools for patients, physicians, and educators.

机译:骨骼质量:针对患者,医师和教育者的教育工具。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Defining bone quality remains elusive. From a patient perspective bone quality can best be defined as an individual's likelihood of sustaining a fracture. Fracture risk indicators and performance measures can help clinicians better understand individual fracture risk. Educational resources such as the Web can help clinicians and patients better understand fracture risk, communicate effectively, and make decisions concerning diagnosis and treatment. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We examined four questions: What tools can be used to identify individuals at high risk for fracture? What clinical performance measures are available? What strategies can help ensure that patients at risk for fracture are identified? What are some authoritative Web sites for educating providers and patients about bone quality? METHODS: Using Google, PUBMED, and trademark names, we reviewed the literature using the terms "bone quality" and osteoporosis education. criteria. Educational Web sites were limited to English-language sites sponsored by nonprofit organizations RESULTS: The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool(R) (FRAX(R)) and the Fracture Risk Calculator (FRC) are reliable means of assessing fracture risk. Performance measures relating to bone health were developed by the AMA convened Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement(R) and are included in the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative. In addition, quality measures have been developed by the Joint Commission. Strategies for identifying individuals at risk include designating responsibility for case finding and intervention, evaluating secondary causes of osteoporosis, educating patients and providers, performing cost-effectiveness evaluation, and using information technology. An abundance of authoritative educational Web sites exists for providers and patients. CONCLUSIONS: Effective clinical indicators, performance measures, and educational tools to better understand and identify fracture risk are now available. The next challenge is to encourage broader use of these resources so that individuals at high risk for fracture will not just be identified but will also adhere to therapy.
机译:背景:定义骨质量仍然难以捉摸。从患者的角度来看,最好将骨质量定义为个体承受骨折的可能性。骨折风险指标和性能指标可帮助临床医生更好地了解个体骨折风险。诸如Web的教育资源可以帮助临床医生和患者更好地了解骨折风险,进行有效沟通并做出有关诊断和治疗的决策。问题/目的:我们研究了四个问题:哪些工具可用于识别高骨折风险个体?有哪些临床表现指标?哪些策略可以帮助确保确定有骨折风险的患者?有哪些权威的网站可以教育提供者和患者有关骨骼质量的信息?方法:使用Google,PUBMED和商标名称,我们使用“骨骼质量”和骨质疏松症教育术语对文献进行了回顾。标准。教育网站仅限于非营利组织赞助的英语网站。结果:骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)和骨折风险计算器(FRC)是评估骨折风险的可靠方法。 AMA召集的医师联合会改进了与骨骼健康相关的绩效评估,并被纳入了医师质量报告计划。此外,联合委员会还制定了质量措施。识别高危人群的策略包括指定病例发现和干预责任,评估骨质疏松症的次要原因,教育患者和提供者,进行成本效益评估以及使用信息技术。提供者和患者的权威性教育网站很多。结论:现已有有效的临床指标,性能指标和教育工具,可以更好地理解和识别骨折风险。下一个挑战是鼓励更广泛地使用这些资源,以使面临骨折风险的人不仅能被识别,而且会坚持治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号