首页> 外文期刊>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery: official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract >Prospective nonrandomized comparison between pylorus-preserving and subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy from the perspectives of DGE occurrence and postoperative digestive functions.
【24h】

Prospective nonrandomized comparison between pylorus-preserving and subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy from the perspectives of DGE occurrence and postoperative digestive functions.

机译:从DGE的发生和术后消化功能的角度,对保留幽门和胃次全胃胰十二指肠切除术进行前瞻性非随机比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: To determine the influence of pylorus preservation after pancreaticoduodenectomy, we compared the postoperative course of subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (SSPPD) and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD). METHODS: A prospective, nonrandomized comparison of 77 consecutive patients undergoing PPPD (n = 37) or SSPPD (n = 40) between January 2003 and March 2007 was planned. The early postoperative course, dietary intake, and the incidence of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) were evaluated. RESULTS: SSPPD included significantly more cases of regional lymph node dissection (D2, PPPD 53% vs. SSPPD 80%) and portal vein resection. The median duration of surgery (457 vs. 520 min) was significantly shorter, and blood loss (619 vs. 1,235 ml) was significantly less in PPPD. Regarding postoperative clinical factors, the duration of nasogastric tube intubation (1 vs.1 day), days until solid diet (7 vs. 7 days), and the incidence of DGE (9% vs.10%) were similar in PPPD and SSPPD. However, the postoperative/preoperative body weight ratio (95% vs. 93%) was significantly higher, and the postoperative hospital stay (31 vs. 38 days) was significantly shorter in PPPD (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the bias of the operative factors, the incidence of DGE and postoperative dietary intake after SSPPD was comparable with PPPD, and therefore, pylorus preservation seemed to have no impact on postoperative dietary intake or DGE.
机译:背景:为了确定保留胰十二指肠切除术对保留幽门的影响,我们比较了保留胃小肠胰十二指肠切除术(SSPPD)和保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术(PPPD)的术后过程。方法:计划在2003年1月至2007年3月期间对77位连续接受PPPD(n = 37)或SSPPD(n = 40)的患者进行前瞻性,非随机比较。评估术后早期病程,饮食摄入量和胃排空延迟(DGE)的发生率。结果:SSPPD包括更多的区域淋巴结清扫病例(D2,PPPD 53%,SSPPD 80%)和门静脉切除。 PPPD的中位手术时间(457 vs. 520分钟)明显缩短,失血量(619 vs. 1,235 ml)明显减少。关于术后临床因素,PPPD和SSPPD的鼻胃管插管持续时间(1天比1天),直到固体饮食的天数(7天比7天)和DGE的发生率(9%比10%)相似。 。但是,PPPD的术后/术前体重比(95%比93%)明显更高,术后住院时间(31 vs. 38天)明显缩短(p <0.05)。结论:尽管手术因素存在偏差,但SSPPD后DGE的发生率和术后饮食摄入量与PPPD相当,因此,保留幽门似乎对术后饮食摄入或DGE没有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号