首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular surgery >Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial: Health-related quality of life outcomes, resource utilization, and cost-effectiveness analysis
【24h】

Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial: Health-related quality of life outcomes, resource utilization, and cost-effectiveness analysis

机译:严重腿部缺血(BASIL)试验中的旁路与血管成形术:与健康相关的生活质量,资源利用和成本效益分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial showed that survival in patients with severe lower limb ischemia (rest pain, tissue loss) who survived postintervention for >2 years after initial randomization to bypass surgery (BSX) vs balloon angioplasty (BAP) was associated with an improvement in subsequent amputation-free and overall survival of about 6 and 7 months, respectively. We now compare the effect on hospital costs and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of the BSX-first and BAP-first revascularization strategies using a within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis.Methods: We measured HRQOL using the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQol), the Short Form 36 (SF-36), and the EuroQol (EQ-5D) health outcome measure up to 3 years from randomization. Hospital use was measured and valued using United Kingdom National Health Service hospital costs over 3 years. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated for cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Uncertainty was assessed using nonparametric bootstrapping of incremental costs and incremental effects. Results: No significant differences in HRQOL emerged when the two treatment strategies were compared. During the first year from randomization, the mean cost of inpatient hospital treatment in patients allocated to BSX (dollar34,378) was estimated to be about dollar8469 (95% confidence interval, dollar2,417-dollar14,522) greater than that of patients allocated to BAP (dollar25,909). Owing to increased costs subsequently incurred by the BAP patients, this difference decreased at the end of follow-up to dollar5521 (dollar45,322 for BSX vs dollar39,801 for BAP) and was no longer significant. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of a BSX-first strategy was dollar184,492 per QALY gained. The probability that BSX was more cost-effective than BAP was relatively low given the similar distributions in HRQOL, surv...
机译:背景:严重腿部缺血的旁路搭桥术与血管成形术(BASIL)试验显示,严重的下肢缺血(静息疼痛,组织丢失)患者的生存率在首次随机分组搭桥手术(BSX)干预后存活> 2年球囊血管成形术(BAP)与随后的无截肢和总生存期分别改善约6个月和7个月有关。我们现在使用试验内成本效益分析比较BSX优先和BAP优先血运重建策略对医院成本和健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)的影响。方法:我们使用血管生命质量对HRQOL进行了测量问卷调查(VascuQol),简短表格36(SF-36)和EuroQol(EQ-5D)的健康结局可在随机分组后的3年内进行测量。使用英国国家卫生局3年以上的医院成本来评估和评估医院的使用情况。分析是按意向性进行的。为获得的每质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本估算了增量成本效益比。使用增量成本和增量影响的非参数自举评估不确定性。结果:比较两种治疗策略时,HRQOL差异无统计学意义。在随机化的第一年中,分配给BSX的患者的住院住院平均费用(34,378美元)估计比分配的患者高8469美元(95%置信区间,2,417-1,522美元)。到BAP(25,909美元)。由于BAP患者随后发生的费用增加,这种差异在随访结束时减少至5521美元(BSX为45322美元,而BAP为39801美元)不再显着。 BSX优先策略的增量成本效益比为每获得QALY 184,492美元。鉴于HRQOL中的分布相似,因此BSX比BAP更具成本效益的可能性相对较低,

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号