首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular surgery >Does female gender or hormone replacement therapy affect early or late outcome after carotid endarterectomy?
【24h】

Does female gender or hormone replacement therapy affect early or late outcome after carotid endarterectomy?

机译:女性性别或激素替代治疗是否会影响颈动脉内膜切除术后的早期或晚期结果?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Subgroup analyses of the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial trials have questioned the ability of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) to reduce the risk of stroke in women. The purpose of this study was to test the effect of female gender and estrogen-based hormone replacement therapy on perioperative (30-day) and long-term (5-year) outcomes after CEA. METHODS: From 1988 to 1998, 361 CEAs were performed in 326 patients (246 male, 115 female) by a single surgeon. Retrospective data were collected with chart review, and follow-up data were obtained with clinical examination or telephone interview. Follow-up was possible in 95% of patients. Reoperative CEAs and combined aortic or cardiac procedures were excluded. Statistical analysis used life-table methods, Student t test, and Pearson chi(2) tests when appropriate. RESULTS: Age and preoperative risk factors were similar between women and men. CEA was performed for symptomatic (50% female, 42% male) and asymptomatic carotid stenosis (50% female, 58% male; P =.19). Perioperative (30-day) stroke rate was similar for women and men (3.6% female, 1.2% male; P =.13). No perioperative strokes occurred in asymptomatic patients. With previous stroke or transient ischemic attack, a trend was seen towards an increased perioperative stroke rate in women (7.0% female, 2.8% male; P =.25). Long-term follow-up showed a similar trend in the 5-year stroke rate in symptomatic patients (7.0% female, 2.8 male; P =.23). The stroke-free survival rate was not significantly different between genders (87% female, 75% male; P =.58). Reoperation was performed for asymptomatic recurrent carotid stenosis in five men (2.3%) and two women (1.9%; P =.84). Interestingly, the use of estrogen-based hormone replacement therapy in women showed a trend toward increasing stroke rate at 30 days (1.2% versus 8.7%; P =.08) and at 5 years (2.3% versus 8.7%; P =.16). CONCLUSION: This retrospective study confirms that CEA provides long-term reduction in stroke risk and improved stroke-free survival rates in both men and women. However, women with previous neurologic symptoms and those using hormone replacement therapy appear to be at higher stroke risk at the time of surgery.
机译:目的:无症状颈动脉粥样硬化研究和北美有症状颈动脉内膜切除术试验的亚组分析对颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)降低女性中风风险的能力提出了质疑。这项研究的目的是测试女性和基于雌激素的激素替代治疗对CEA围手术期(30天)和长期(5年)结局的影响。方法:从1988年至1998年,由单名外科医生对326例患者进行了361例CEA(男246例,女115例)。通过图表审查收集回顾性数据,并通过临床检查或电话访谈获得随访数据。 95%的患者可以进行随访。排除了再次手术CEA和主动脉或心脏联合手术。统计分析在适当时使用寿命表方法,Student t检验和Pearson chi(2)检验。结果:男女之间的年龄和术前危险因素相似。对有症状(女性50%,男性42%)和无症状颈动脉狭窄(女性50%,男性58%; P = .19)进行CEA。男女的围手术期(30天)卒中发生率相似(女性3.6%,男性1.2%; P = .13)。无症状患者未发生围手术期中风。随着先前的中风或短暂性脑缺血发作,女性围手术期中风发生率呈上升趋势(女性为7.0%,男性为2​​.8%; P = .25)。有症状患者的5年中风发生率的长期随访结果相似(女性7.0%,男性2.8%; P = .23)。男女无卒中生存率无显着差异(女性为87%,男性为75%; P = .58)。 5例男性(2.3%)和2例女性(1.9%; P = .84)因无症状复发性颈动脉狭窄再次手术。有趣的是,在女性中使用基于雌激素的激素替代疗法在30天(1.2%对8.7%; P = .08)和5年时(2.3%对8.7%; P = .16)显示出卒中率增加的趋势。 )。结论:这项回顾性研究证实,CEA可长期降低中风风险,并提高男女的无中风生存率。但是,有神经症状的女性和使用激素替代疗法的女性在手术时似乎有较高的中风风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号