首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular surgery >Trends in aortic aneurysm surgical training for general and vascular surgery residents in the era of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
【24h】

Trends in aortic aneurysm surgical training for general and vascular surgery residents in the era of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

机译:在血管内腹主动脉瘤修复时代,针对普通和血管外科住院医师的主动脉瘤外科培训趋势。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

HYPOTHESIS: The emergence of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair may negatively impact the open AAA experience of general surgery residents. METHODS: Prospectively collected data on general and vascular surgery resident training in AAA repair for a 5-year period (1997 to 2001) at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Five general surgery residents and one vascular resident completed training yearly. Institutional volume of open and endovascular repair of AAA was also assessed. RESULTS: The cumulative mean general surgical resident experience with open AAA repair fell significantly over a 5-year period; 9.5 +/- 2.5 cases were performed per general surgical resident finishing in 1997, 7.5 +/- 0.3 cases in 1998, 4.6 +/- 0.4 cases in 1999, 4.0 +/- 1.3 cases in 2000, and 4.2 +/- 1.0 cases in 2001 (P =.03). The vascular resident experience with open AAA repair did not change significantly over the 5-year period. However, the active development of an endovascular AAA program increased total AAA exposure of the vascular resident from 26 cases in 1997 to a mean of 70 cases in 2000 and 2001. The institution volume of open nonsuprarenal AAA repairs fell 38% during the 5-year period (P =.33) during a period when endovascular AAA repair increased from 9 (1996) to 55 (2000) cases (P <.001). The complexity of open AAA surgery also increased: 23.3% of open cases (7/30) in 2000 were juxta/pararenal versus 2.9% (1/35) in 1996 (P =.05). CONCLUSION: The introduction of endovascular AAA repair may have negatively impacted general surgical resident training in open AAA repair. The number of open AAA cases declined, and their complexity significantly increased. Many uncomplicated AAAs were managed with endovascular means. At programs with such a paradigm shift in AAA treatment, expectation that general surgery residents gain the proficiency necessary to safely perform AAA repair without additional training may be unrealistic.
机译:假设:腔内腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复的出现可能会对普通外科手术患者开放AAA体验产生负面影响。方法:回顾性收集在单个机构进行为期5年(1997年至2001年)的AAA修复的普通和血管外科住院医师培训的数据。每年有5名普外科住院医师和1名血管住院医师完成培训。还评估了AAA的开放和血管内修复的机构量。结果:在5年内,进行AAA开放性修复的一般外科住院医师的累积平均经验显着下降。 1997年,每个普通外科住院医师完成手术9.5 +/- 2.5例,1998年为7.5 +/- 0.3例,1999年为4.6 +/- 0.4例,2000年为4.0 +/- 1.3例,以及4.2 +/- 1.0例在2001年(P = .03)。在5年的时间里,开放AAA修复的血管居民经验没有明显改变。但是,积极开发血管内AAA计划使血管居民的AAA总暴露量从1997年的26例增加到2000年和2001年的平均70例。在开放的5年中,非肾上膜AAA修复的机构数量减少了38%血管内AAA修复从9例(1996)增至55例(2000)(P <.001)的时期(P = .33)。开放性AAA手术的复杂性也增加了:2000年开放性病例的23.3%(7/30)为近经/肾旁,而1996年为2.9%(1/35)(P = .05)。结论:血管内AAA修复的引入可能对开放式AAA修复的普通外科住院医师培训产生负面影响。未决AAA案件的数量有所下降,其复杂性显着增加。许多简单的AAA通过血管内手段进行管理。在AAA治疗模式发生转变的计划中,期望普通外科手术患者获得无需额外培训即可安全地进行AAA修复所必需的熟练程度可能是不现实的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号