首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Thermal Biology >Extreme operative temperatures are better descriptors of the thermal environment than mean temperatures
【24h】

Extreme operative temperatures are better descriptors of the thermal environment than mean temperatures

机译:极端工作温度比平均温度更好地描述了热环境

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In ecological studies of thermal biology the thermal environment is most frequently described using the mean or other measures of central tendency in environmental temperatures. However, this procedure may hide biologically relevant thermal variation for ectotherms, potentially misleading interpretations. Extremes of operative temperatures (EOT) can help with this problem by bracketing the thermal environment of focal animals. Within this paper, we quantify how mean operative temperatures relate to the range of simultaneously available operative temperatures (a measure of error). We also show how EOT: 1) detect more thermal differences among microsites than measures of central tendency, like the mean OT, 2) allow inferring on microsite use by ectothermic animals, and 3) clarify the relationships between field operative temperatures and temperatures measured at weather stations (WS). To do that, we explored operative temperatures measured at four sites of the Brazilian Caatingas and their correspondent nearest weather stations. We found that the daily mean OT can hide temperature ranges of 41 degrees C simultaneously available at our study sites. In addition, EOT detected more thermal differences among microsites than central quantiles. We also show how EOT allow inferring about microsite use of ectothermic animals in a given site. Finally, the daily maximum temperature and the daily temperature range measured at WSs predicted well the minimum available field OT at localities many kilometers away. Based on our results, we recommend the use of EOT, instead of mean OT, in thermal ecology studies. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在热生物学的生态研究中,最经常使用环境温度集中趋势的平均值或其他度量来描述热环境。但是,此过程可能隐藏了等温线的生物学相关热变化,可能会引起误解。极端的工作温度(EOT)通过将局灶动物的热环境包围起来,可以解决此问题。在本文中,我们量化了平均操作温度与同时可用的操作温度范围(误差的度量)之间的关系。我们还展示了EOT如何:1)在微站点之间检测到的热差异大于集中趋势的度量值(如平均OT),2)推断出放热动物对微站点的使用,以及3)阐明现场工作温度与温度测量值之间的关系。气象站(WS)。为此,我们探索了在巴西Caatingas的四个站点及其相应的最近气象站测得的工作温度。我们发现每日平均OT可以隐藏我们研究地点同时可用的41摄氏度的温度范围。此外,EOT在微站点之间检测到的热差异要大于中心分位数。我们还展示了EOT如何允许推断给定位置中的放热动物在微场所的使用。最后,在WSs处测得的每日最高温度和每日温度范围很好地预测了在几公里外的地方的最小可用场OT。根据我们的结果,我们建议在热生态学研究中使用EOT代替平均OT。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号