首页> 外文期刊>Clinical oral investigations >Two-year results of vital pulp therapy in permanent molars with irreversible pulpitis: An ongoing multicenter randomized clinical trial
【24h】

Two-year results of vital pulp therapy in permanent molars with irreversible pulpitis: An ongoing multicenter randomized clinical trial

机译:永久性磨牙伴不可逆性牙髓炎的活髓治疗的两年结果:一项正在进行的多中心随机临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: Oral healthcare expenses are increasing rapidly as a result of the growth of high-cost health technologies worldwide. In many developing/developed countries, low-cost tooth extraction is the alternative treatment option for a high-cost root canal therapy (RCT) for management of human molars with irreversible pulpitis. Vital pulp therapy with calcium-enriched mixture cement (VPT/CEM) as a new alternative treatment option has demonstrated excellent treatment outcomes up to 1 year; if 2-year radiographic/clinical effectiveness as well as cost-effectiveness of the VPT/CEM is also non-inferior compared with RCT, it can serve as a viable treatment for mature molars with irreversible pulpitis. Materials and methods: In this prospective, multicenter (n = 23), non-inferiority clinical trial, 407 patients were randomized to either one-visit RCT (n = 202) or VPT/CEM (n = 205) for 27 months. In this part of study, the primary outcome measure was the 2-year clinical and radiographic treatment outcomes. Cost-effectiveness was also analyzed. Results: Mean follow-up times were 24.62 ± 0.72 and 24.61 ± 0.69 months in RCT (n = 166) and VPT/CEM (n = 166) arms, respectively. Clinical success rates in the two study arms were equal (98.19 %); however, radiographic success rates were 79.5 and 86.7 % in RCT and VPT/CEM arms, respectively, with no statistical difference (P = 0.053). The treatment time span mean was approximately three times greater in the RCT than in the VPT/CEM arm (94.07 vs. 31.09 min; P < 0.001). RCT had a cost of 171.5K per molar tooth compared with 44.5K for VPT. Conclusions: VPT/CEM reduced time and cost spent. When considering clinical as well as cost-effectiveness of VPT/CEM, this treatment option is not only non-inferior but also superior to RCT in mature permanent molar teeth with established irreversible pulpitis. Clinical relevance: Vital pulp therapy with CEM is a cost-effective and reliable biological technique for endodontic treatment of permanent molar teeth with irreversible pulpitis and can be recommended for general clinical practice.
机译:目标:由于全球成本高的健康技术的增长,口腔保健费用正在迅速增加。在许多发展中国家/发达国家,低成本拔牙是高成本的根管治疗(RCT)的不可替代的治疗选择,用于治疗患有不可逆性牙髓炎的磨牙。使用富含钙的混合水泥(VPT / CEM)作为新的替代治疗方案的活髓治疗已显示了长达一年的出色治疗效果;如果VPT / CEM的2年放射学/临床效果以及成本效果不比RCT差,它可以作为治疗不可逆性牙髓炎的成熟磨牙的可行方法。材料和方法:在这项前瞻性,多中心(n = 23)的非劣效性临床试验中,将407例患者随机分两次接受一次RCT(n = 202)或VPT / CEM(n = 205)治疗27个月。在这部分研究中,主要结局指标是2年临床和影像学治疗结局。还分析了成本效益。结果:RCT(n = 166)和VPT / CEM(n = 166)组的平均随访时间分别为24.62±0.72和24.61±0.69个月。两个研究组的临床成功率相等(98.19%);然而,RCT和VPT / CEM组的放射照相成功率分别为79.5%和86.7%,无统计学差异(P = 0.053)。 RCT中的治疗时间跨度平均值大约是VPT / CEM组的三倍(94.07对31.09分钟; P <0.001)。 RCT每颗磨牙的成本为171.5K,而VPT为44.5K。结论:VPT / CEM减少了时间和成本。考虑到VPT / CEM的临床以及成本效益,这种治疗方法不仅对具有永久性不可逆牙髓炎的成熟恒磨牙有效,而且不劣于RCT。临床意义:CEM活髓治疗是一种成本有效且可靠的生物学技术,用于牙髓治疗不可逆性牙髓炎的恒牙磨牙,可推荐用于一般临床实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号