首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR >Transcatheter CT Arterial Portography and CT Hepatic Arteriography for Liver Tumor Visualizationduring Percutaneous Ablation
【24h】

Transcatheter CT Arterial Portography and CT Hepatic Arteriography for Liver Tumor Visualizationduring Percutaneous Ablation

机译:经导管CT动脉门静脉造影和CT肝动脉造影在经皮消融期间可视化肝肿瘤

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of combining transcaiheier computed tomography (CT) arterial portography or transeatheter CT hepatic arieriography with percutaneous licr ablation for optimized and repeated tumor exposure. Materials and Methods: Study participants were 20 patients (13 men and 7 women; mean age, 59.4 y; range, 40 76 y) with unresectable liver-only malignancies 14 with colorectal liver metastases (29 lesions). 5 with hepatocellular carcinoma (7 lesions), and 1 with intrnhcpatic cholangiocarcinoma (2 lesions) - -that were obscure on nonenhanced CT. A catheter was placed within the superior mesenteric artery (CT arterial portography) or in the hepatic artcr> (CT hepatic arteriography). CT arterial portography or CT hepatic arteriography was repeatedly performed after injecting 30 -60 mL 1:2 diluted contrast material to plan, guide, and evaluate ablation. The operator confidence levels and the liver-to-lesion attenuation differences were assessed as well as needle-lo-target mismatch distance, technical success, and technique effectiveness after 3 months. Results: Technical success rate was 100%: there were no major complications. Compared with conventional unenhanced CT. operator confidence increased significantly for CT arterial portography or CT hepatic arteriography cases (P < .001). The liver-io-lesion attenuation differences between unenhanced CT. contrast-enhanced CT. and CT arterial portography or CT hepatic arteriography were statistically significant (mean attenuation difference. 5 HU vs 28 HU vs 70 HU: P < .001). Mean needlc-to-targct mismatch distance was 2.4 mm ?2 (range. 0 12.0 mm). Primary technique effectiveness at 3 months was 87% (33 of 38 lesions). Conclusions: In patients with technically unresectable liver-only malignancies, single-session CT arterial portography guided or CT hepatic arteriography guided percutaneous tumor ablation enables repeated contrast-enhanced imaging and real-time contrast-enhanced CT lluoroscopy and improves lesion conspicuity.
机译:目的:评价经皮计算机断层扫描(CT)动脉门静脉造影或经导管CT肝动脉造影与经皮穿刺消融术相结合以优化和重复暴露肿瘤的可行性。材料和方法:研究对象为20例患者(男13例,女7例;平均年龄59.4岁;范围:40 76岁),伴有不可切除的仅肝恶性肿瘤14例伴有大肠肝转移(29个病灶)。 5例肝细胞癌(7个病灶)和1例内胆管胆管癌(2个病灶)-在非增强CT上不清楚。将导管置于肠系膜上动脉(CT动脉门静脉造影)或肝动脉(CT肝动脉造影)中。注射30 -60 mL 1:2稀释的对比剂后,反复进行CT动脉门静脉造影或CT肝动脉造影,以计划,指导和评估消融。 3个月后评估了操作者的置信水平和肝脏至病变的衰减差异,以及针头目标错配距离,技术成功率和技术有效性。结果:技术成功率为100%:无重大并发症。与传统的未增强CT相比。 CT动脉门静脉造影或CT肝动脉造影病例的操作者信心显着提高(P <.001)。未增强CT之间的肝脏病变衰减差异。对比增强CT。和CT动脉门静脉造影或CT肝动脉造影具有统计学意义(平均衰减差异。5 HU vs 28 HU vs 70 HU:P <.001)。针与针的平均失配距离为2.4 mm?2(范围:0 12.0 mm)。 3个月时的主要技术有效率为87%(38个病变中的33个)。结论:对于仅手术切除的仅肝恶性肿瘤的患者,单次CT动脉门静脉造影术或CT肝动脉造影术指导的经皮肿瘤消融术可重复进行造影剂增强成像和实时造影剂增强CT输尿管镜检查,并改善病变的明显性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号