...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR >Image guidance for endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms: Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional angiography and image fusion
【24h】

Image guidance for endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms: Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional angiography and image fusion

机译:复杂主动脉瘤血管内修复的图像指导:二维和三维血管造影和图像融合的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of image fusion (IF) of preprocedural arterial-phase computed tomography with intraprocedural fluoroscopy for roadmapping in endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms, and to compare this approach versus current roadmapping methods (ie, two-dimensional [2D] and three-dimensional [3D] angiography). Materials and Methods Thirty-seven consecutive patients with complex aortic aneurysms treated with endovascular techniques were retrospectively reviewed; these included aneurysms of digestive and/or renal arteries and pararenal and juxtarenal aortic aneurysms. All interventions were performed with the same angiographic system. According to the availability of different roadmapping software, patients were successively placed into three intraprocedural image guidance groups: (i) 2D angiography (n = 9), (ii) 3D rotational angiography (n = 14), and (iii) IF (n = 14). X-ray exposure (dose-area product [DAP]), injected contrast medium volume, and procedure time were recorded. Results Patient characteristics were similar among groups, with no statistically significant differences (P ≥.05). There was no statistical difference in endograft deployment success between groups (2D angiography, eight of nine patients [89%]; 3D angiography and IF, 14 of 14 patients each [100%]). The IF group showed significant reduction (P .0001) in injected contrast medium volume versus other groups (2D, 235 mL ± 145; 3D, 225 mL ± 119; IF, 65 mL ± 28). Mean DAP values showed no significant difference between groups (2D, 1,188 Gy·cm2 ± 1,067; 3D, 984 Gy·cm2 ± 581; IF, 655 Gy·cm2 ± 457; P =.18); nor did procedure times (2D, 233 min ± 123; 3D, 181 min ± 53; IF, 189 min ± 60; P =.59). Conclusions The use of IF-based roadmapping is a feasible technique for endovascular complex aneurysm repair associated with significant reduction of injected contrast agent volume and similar x-ray exposure and procedure time.
机译:目的评估术前动脉期计算机断层扫描与术中荧光透视图像融合(IF)在复杂主动脉瘤血管内修复中进行路标映射的可行性,并将这种方法与目前的路标映射方法(即二维[2D]和三维[3D]血管造影)。材料与方法回顾性分析了37例行血管内技术治疗的复杂性主动脉瘤患者。这些包括消化道和/或肾动脉的动脉瘤以及肾旁和近肾主动脉瘤。所有干预均使用相同的血管造影系统进行。根据不同路线图软件的可用性,将患者依次分为三个过程内图像引导组:(i)2D血管造影(n = 9),(ii)3D旋转血管造影(n = 14)和(iii)IF(n = 14)。记录X射线照射(剂量面积乘积[DAP]),注射的造影剂体积和操作时间。结果各组患者特征相似,差异无统计学意义(P≥0.05)。各组之间的内膜移植成功率无统计学差异(2D血管造影,9例患者中的8例[8​​9%]; 3D血管造影和IF,14例患者中的14例[100%])。 IF组与其他组(2D,235 mL±145; 3D,225 mL±119; IF,65 mL±28)相比,注射的造影剂体积显着减少(P <.0001)。组间平均DAP值无显着差异(2D,1,188 Gy·cm2±1,067; 3D,984 Gy·cm2±581; IF,655 Gy·cm2±457; P = .18);手术时间也没有(2D,233 min±123; 3D,181 min±53; IF,189 min±60; P = .59)。结论使用基于IF的路线图是一种可行的血管内复杂动脉瘤修复技术,可显着减少注射的造影剂体积以及相似的X射线暴露和手术时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号