首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR >Wire Loop Methods for Retrieval of Trapped Inferior Vena Cava Filters: 10-F Versus 16-F Sheath Technique
【24h】

Wire Loop Methods for Retrieval of Trapped Inferior Vena Cava Filters: 10-F Versus 16-F Sheath Technique

机译:线环方法用于检索被困的下腔静脉滤器:10-F对16-F护套技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We read with great interest the article by Rubenstein et al (1) in the October 2007 issue of JVIR about a guide wire looptechnique for retrieval of trapped or tilted inferior vena cava (IVC) filters. We were quite impressed by the results of their technique, which demonstrated successful retrieval of four Recovery filters (C.R. Bard, Tempe, Arizona) and four Gunther-Tulip filters (GTFs) (Cook, Bloomington, Indiana) refractory to standard methods, but we were somewhat surprised that the basic guide wire loop idea was not new but in fact quite similar to a technique that we previously described a year earlier in the November 2006 issue of JVIR (2). Nevertheless, we examined their methods in detail because we were interested in any new variations and potential improvements to the technique. An important point that we learned from Rubenstein et al (1) is that it may be easier to create the guide wire loop by using a reverse-curve catheter engaged around the struts of the GTF, to more effectively redirect the wire, and we have since adopted this maneuver as another option for creating the loop. However, upon further scrutiny of their technique, we were surprised by the recommendation of placing a large 16-F sheath for filter capture (1). This differs significantly from our method, which requires only a 10-F sheath for GTF retrieval (2). Another major difference is that our technique employs a Goose Neck snare (ev3, Plymouth, Minnesota) tracked over both limbs of the guide wire loop to engage the hook and neck of the filter before capture by the sheath (2). We believe the addition of a Goose Neck snare, advanced over the guide wire loop, permits a lower profile for retrieval because the cephalad region of the GTF is engaged by the synergistic effect of the two snares in combination, allowing filter capture by a 10-F sheath. The technique by Rubenstein et al (1) employs no such snare but instead relies on a coaxial inner 8-F sheath. Although the 8-F sheath may engage the filter hook, it does not capture the entire filter and necessitates advancement of an overlying 16-F sheath for retrieval.
机译:我们非常感兴趣地阅读了Rubenstein等人(1)在2007年10月出版的JVIR上的文章,其中介绍了一种用于回收滞留或倾斜的下腔静脉(IVC)过滤器的导丝环技术。他们的技术成果给我们留下了深刻的印象,该技术展示了成功回收了四个标准方法所用的Recover过滤器(CR Bard,Tempe,亚利桑那州)和四个Gunther-Tulip过滤器(GTF)(Cook,Bloomington,印第安纳州)令我们感到惊讶的是,基本的导丝环概念并不是什么新鲜事物,但实际上与我们一年前在2006年11月发行的JVIR(2)中描述的技术非常相似。但是,我们对它们的方法进行了详细检查,因为我们对这项技术的任何新变化和潜在改进都感兴趣。我们从鲁宾斯坦(Rubenstein)等人(1)中学到的一个重要点是,通过使用一条围绕GTF支杆的反向弯曲导管来创建导丝环可能更容易,以便更有效地重定向导丝,因为采用了这种方法作为创建循环的另一种选择。但是,在进一步审查他们的技术时,我们对放置一个大的16-F护套来捕获过滤器的建议感到惊讶(1)。这与我们的方法有很大不同,后者仅需10-F护套即可进行GTF取出(2)。另一个主要区别是,我们的技术采用了在导丝环的两个分支上跟踪的鹅颈圈套器(ev3,普利茅斯,明尼苏达州),以便在被护套(2)捕获之前接合过滤器的钩子和颈部。我们相信,在导丝环上加进鹅颈圈套器可以降低取回的轮廓,因为GTF的头部区域通过两个圈套器的协同作用而结合在一起,从而可以通过10- F护套。 Rubenstein等人(1)的技术没有采用这种圈套器,而是依靠同轴的内部8-F护套。尽管8-F护套可以与过滤器挂钩接合,但它无法捕获整个过滤器,因此需要推进上覆的16-F护套才能取回。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号