首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR >Randomized prospective comparison of alteplase versus saline solution for the percutaneous treatment of loculated abdominopelvic abscesses.
【24h】

Randomized prospective comparison of alteplase versus saline solution for the percutaneous treatment of loculated abdominopelvic abscesses.

机译:阿替普酶与盐溶液经皮经皮治疗定位性腹盆腔脓肿的随机前瞻性比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: To determine if alteplase infusion for the treatment of loculated abdominopelvic abscesses requiring percutaneous catheter drainage was superior to saline solution infusion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study was a single-center prospective randomized trial. Patients with loculated abdominopelvic abscesses unsuccessfully drained by initial catheter placement were randomized to receive the fibrinolytic agent alteplase or normal saline solution. The amount of alteplase used to treat abscesses was 2 mg or 4 mg based on infusion volumes of 0-50 mL or 51-100 mL, respectively. Infusions were administered twice daily for 3 days. Computed tomography was performed before initiation of therapy and immediately after 3 days of infusions. Success was defined by removal of the catheter after drainage without recurrent abscess or surgical intervention within 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were included in this study: 11 received alteplase and nine received normal saline solution. There was no significant difference in the distribution of sex (P = .08) or age (P = .29). Abscess resolution was achieved in nine of 11 alteplase-treated patients (80%) versus three of nine saline solution-treated patients (33%). However, one patient in each group required repeat intervention within 30 days, for overall success rates of 73% versus 22%, respectively (P = .02). Having observed a significant difference in the primary outcome variable, the study was terminated early. CONCLUSIONS: A 3-day course of twice-daily alteplase infusion therapy is superior to normal saline solution for the treatment of loculated abdominopelvic abscesses.
机译:目的:确定阿替普酶输注治疗需要经皮导管引流的局限性腹腔盆腔脓肿是否优于盐溶液输注。方法和材料:本研究为单中心前瞻性随机试验。通过导管初次放置未能成功引流的定位性腹盆腔脓肿患者被随机分配接受纤溶剂阿替普酶或生理盐水治疗。基于0-50 mL或51-100 mL的输注量,用于治疗脓肿的阿替普酶的量分别为2 mg或4 mg。每天两次输注,持续3天。在开始治疗前和输注3天后立即进行计算机断层扫描。成功的定义是在引流后30天内无复发脓肿或手术干预的情况下拔出导管。结果:本研究共纳入20例患者:11例接受阿替普酶治疗,9例接受生理盐水治疗。性别(P = .08)或年龄(P = .29)的分布没有显着差异。 11名接受阿替普酶治疗的患者中有9名(80%)实现了脓肿消退,而9名盐溶液治疗的患者中有3名(33%)实现了脓肿消退。但是,每组中的一名患者需要在30天内进行重复干预,总体成功率分别为73%和22%(P = .02)。观察到主要结果变量存在显着差异后,该研究提早终止。结论:每天两次的阿替普酶输注疗法为期3天的疗程优于普通盐溶液治疗局限性腹腔盆腔脓肿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号