...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR >Portal flow and arterioportal shunting after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation.
【24h】

Portal flow and arterioportal shunting after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation.

机译:经颈静脉肝内门体分流术创建后门静脉血流和动脉门分流。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: It was postulated that a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) produces arterioportal shunting and accounts for reversed flow in the intrahepatic portal veins (PVs) after creation of the TIPS. This study sought to quantify this shunting in patients undergoing TIPS creation and/or revision with use of a direct catheter-based technique and by measuring changes in blood oxygenation within the TIPS and the PV. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study consisted of 26 patients. Median Model for End-stage Liver Disease and Child-Pugh scores were 13 and 9, respectively. Primary TIPS creation was attempted in 21 patients and revision of failing TIPS was undertaken in five. In two patients, TIPS creation was unsuccessful. All TIPS creation procedures but one were performed with use of polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent-grafts. Flow within the main PV (Q(portal)) was measured with use of a retrograde thermodilutional catheter before and after TIPS creation/revision, and TIPS flow (Q(TIPS)) was measured at procedure completion. The amount of arterioportal shunting was assumed to be the increase between final Q(portal) and Q(TIPS), assuming Q(TIPS) was equivalent to the final Q(portal) plus the reversed flow in the right and left PVs. Oxygen saturation within the TIPS and the PV was determined from samples obtained during TIPS creation and revision. RESULTS: Mean Q(portal) before TIPS creation was 691 mL/min; mean Q(portal) after TIPS creation was 1,136 mL/min, representing a 64% increase (P = .049). Mean Q(TIPS) was 1,631 mL/min, a 44% increase from final Q(portal) (P = .0009). Among cases of revision, baseline Q(portal) was 1,010 mL/min and mean Q(portal) after TIPS revision was 1,415 mL/min, a 40% increase. Mean Q(TIPS) was 1,693 mL/min, a 20% increase from final Q(portal) (P = .42). Arterioportal shunting rates were 494 mL/min after TIPS creation and 277 mL/min after TIPS revision, representing 30% of total Q(TIPS) after TIPS creation and 16% of Q(TIPS) after TIPS revision. No increase in oxygen tension or saturation was seen in the PV or TIPS compared with initial PV levels. Q(TIPS) did not correlate with the portosystemic gradient. CONCLUSION: TIPS creation results in significant arterioportal shunting, with less arterioportal shunting seen among patients who undergo TIPS revision. Further work is necessary to correlate Q(TIPS) with the risk of hepatic encephalopathy and liver failure.
机译:目的:假设经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)会产生动脉门分流,并解释了在创建TIPS后肝内门静脉(PVs)内的血流反向。本研究试图通过使用基于导管的直接技术并通过测量TIPS和PV内血液中氧合的变化来量化进行TIPS创建和/或翻修的患者的这种分流。材料与方法:这项前瞻性研究由26例患者组成。终末期肝病模型和Child-Pugh评分的中位数模型分别为13和9。尝试对21例患者进行原发性TIPS的创建,对5例进行了失败的TIPS的修复。在两名患者中,TIPS创建失败。除一个外,所有TIPS产生程序均使用聚四氟乙烯覆盖的覆膜支架进行。在创建/修订TIPS之前和之后,使用逆行热稀释导管测量主PV内的流量(Q(门)),并在手术完成时测量TIPS的流量(Q(TIPS))。假设Q(TIPS)等于最终Q(Port)加上左右PV的反向流量,则动脉门分流的量应为最终Q(Portal)和Q(TIPS)之间的增加。从TIPS创建和修订过程中获得的样品中确定TIPS和PV中的氧饱和度。结果:TIPS创建前的平均Q(门户)为691 mL / min; TIPS创建后的平均Q(门户)为1,136 mL / min,增加了64%(P = .049)。平均Q(TIPS)为1,631 mL / min,比最终Q(门户)增加44%(P = .0009)。在修订案例中,基线Q(门户)为1,010 mL / min,TIPS修订后的平均Q(门户)为1,415 mL / min,增加了40%。平均Q(TIPS)为1,693 mL / min,比最终Q(门户)增加20%(P = .42)。 TIPS创建后的动静脉分流速率为494 mL / min,TIPS修改后为277 mL / min,占TIPS创建后总Q(TIPS)的30%和TIPS修订后Q(TIPS)的16%。与初始PV水平相比,PV或TIPS中未发现氧张力或饱和度增加。 Q(TIPS)与门体梯度无关。结论:TIPS的产生导致明显的动静脉分流,而接受TIPS翻修的患者中动静脉分流较少。要使Q(TIPS)与肝性脑病和肝功能衰竭的风险相关,还需要进一步的工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号