首页> 外文期刊>Journal of wildlife diseases >The epizootiology of anatid herpesvirus 1 infection in free-flying waterfowl: a comparison of latent and active infections among native waterfowl, captive-reared released ducks, and peridomestic or feral ducks.
【24h】

The epizootiology of anatid herpesvirus 1 infection in free-flying waterfowl: a comparison of latent and active infections among native waterfowl, captive-reared released ducks, and peridomestic or feral ducks.

机译:自由飞行水禽中带状疱疹病毒1感染的流行病学:天然水禽,圈养饲养的野鸭,家养或野鸭之间潜伏和主动感染的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The epizootiology of anatid herpesvirus 1 (AHV-1) infection in waterfowl is poorly understood but apparently involves persistence of the virus in latently infected birds. Epornitics have often occurred in captive waterfowl or semiwild ducks in parklike settings, and many wildlife professionals conclude that such ducks may be the source of infection for wild waterfowl. We assessed the prevalence of latent infection and viral shedding from four groups of waterfowl: naturally occurring populations of native waterfowl, captive-reared waterfowl released for shooting, introduced nonmigratory waterfowl (e.g., resident, wild Mallards; Anas platyrhynchos), and semiwild peridomestic waterfowl (e.g., park ducks) in North Carolina and Florida, USA from 2004 to 2009. A nested PCR assay was used to detect viral DNA in trigeminal ganglia and cloacal swabs. Detection of viral DNA in trigeminal ganglia, but not cloacal swabs, was assumed to indicate latent infection, whereas PCR-positive cloacal swabs indicated active shedding of the virus. We collected 2,045 samples from 23 species of native, wild waterfowl, and detected latent infections in nine species. Wild Northern Pintails (Anas acuta), a species reportedly resistant to the virus, had the highest prevalence (8.1%). However, low prevalences were identified in other waterfowl from various families. Cloacal shedding was rarely detected (0.1% prevalence) among native waterfowl and was observed in one Blue-winged Teal (Anas discors) and one Mottled Duck (Anas fulvigula). All captive-reared, released waterfowl (n=13) collected were Mallards and one was latently infected, suggesting that these birds could also serve as a source of AHV-1 for naive waterfowl. All nonmigratory waterfowl sampled (n=90) were also Mallards. None of the resident Mallards were shedding virus, but one was latently infected. The peridomestic waterfowl sampled included breeds of domestic Mallard (n=6) and Muscovy Ducks (Cairina moschata; n=73). One peridomestic Mallard and four Muscovy Ducks were shedding virus at the time they were sampled, but no latently infected, asymptomatic carriers were identified.
机译:人们对水禽无头型疱疹病毒1(AHV-1)感染的流行病学了解甚少,但显然涉及该病毒在潜伏感染鸟类中的持久性。在公园般的环境中,圈养水禽或半野生鸭子经常发生禽流感,许多野生动植物专业人士得出结论,此类鸭子可能是野生水禽的传染源。我们评估了四类水禽的潜伏感染和病毒脱落的患病率:天然水禽种群,圈养饲养的水禽以供射击,引入非迁移性水禽(例如,居民,野绿头鸭,鸭绿头鸭)和半野生的周腹水禽2004年至2009年在美国北卡罗莱纳州和佛罗里达州(例如公园鸭子)。使用巢式PCR检测法检测三叉神经节和泄殖腔拭子中的病毒DNA。假定检测到三叉神经节中的病毒DNA,而不是泄殖腔拭子,则表明是潜在的感染,而PCR阳性泄殖腔拭子表明病毒正在主动脱落。我们从23种本地野生水禽中收集了2,045个样本,并在9种中检测到潜在感染。据说对这种病毒有抗性的野生北长尾tail(Anas acuta)的患病率最高(8.1%)。但是,在来自不同家庭的其他水禽中发现了较低的患病率。在本地水禽中很少发现泄殖腔脱落(患病率0.1%),并且在一只蓝翅蓝绿色的野鸭(Anas discors)和一只斑驳的鸭子(Anas fulvigula)中被发现。收集的所有圈养,释放的水禽(n = 13)均为绿头鸭,其中一只被潜伏感染,这表明这些鸟也可以作为幼稚水禽的AHV-1来源。所有非迁徙水禽(n = 90)也都是绿头鸭。居住的绿头野鸭都没有脱落病毒,但其中一名被潜在感染。采样的腹水禽包括家养的野鸭(n = 6)和番鸭(Cairina moschata; n = 73)。在取样时,一只腹腔内的野鸭和四只番鸭正在散发病毒,但没有发现潜伏感染的无症状携带者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号