...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR >Peripherally inserted central catheters: outcome as a function of the operator.
【24h】

Peripherally inserted central catheters: outcome as a function of the operator.

机译:周围插入的中央导管:结果取决于操作员。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To determine the natural history of and outcome involved with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) placed at a single institution and examine potential differences in the natural history of PICCs placed by interventional radiologists (IRs) versus registered nurses (RNs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective analysis of all patients receiving PICCs at one academic medical center over a period of 6.5 months was conducted. At our institution, PICCs are placed primarily by RN members of the intravenous team. Placement procedures deemed unfeasible or problematic by RNs are referred to an IR for insertion under fluoroscopic guidance. A total of 322 PICCs (130 by IRs, 192 by RNs) were successfully placed in 256 patients. In three patients, placement was attempted but was a technical failure by both RNs and IRS: Seven patients in each group were lost to follow-up. PICCs were classified as successfully completed therapy or as having been prematurely removed, which was further stratified into suspected infection, occlusion, phlebitis, mechanical failure, inadvertent patient removal, and other. RESULTS: Overall rate of premature removal for PICCs placed by IRs versus RNs was not significantly different (30.8% vs 23.4%, respectively). PICCs placed by IRs had an increased rate of occlusion (IRs = 9.2%, RNs = 3.6%; P =.02). Other reasons for premature removal did not differ in incidence. Overall, PICCs were successfully placed in 99.1% of all patients and the course of therapy was completed in 69.3%. CONCLUSION: It is reasonable and cost-effective for trained RNs to place PICCs whenever feasible and refer complicated placements to IRS:
机译:目的:确定放置在单个机构中的外周插入中央导管(PICC)的自然病史和预后,并检查介入放射科医生(IR)与注册护士(RN)放置PICC自然史的潜在差异。材料与方法:对在一个学术医疗中心接受PICC的所有患者进行了为期6.5个月的前瞻性分析。在我们的机构中​​,PICC主要由静脉注射小组的RN成员放置。被RN认为不可行或有问题的放置程序将在荧光镜引导下转交给IR进行插入。在256位患者中成功放置了322个PICC(IRs为130个,RNs为192个)。在三例患者中,尝试进行放置,但由于RN和IRS均导致技术失败:每组中有7名患者失去随访。 PICC被分类为成功完成的治疗或已过早切除,进一步分为疑似感染,闭塞,静脉炎,机械衰竭,患者无意间切除及其他。结果:IRs和RNs放置的PICCs的总过早清除率没有显着差异(分别为30.8%和23.4%)。由IR放置的PICC具有更高的阻塞率(IR = 9.2%,RNs = 3.6%; P = .02)。过早清除的其他原因在发病率上没有差异。总体而言,PICCs成功放置于所有患者的99.1%,治疗过程完成了69.3%。结论:训练有素的RN在可行的情况下放置PICC,并将复杂的安置转交给IRS是合理且具有成本效益的:

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号