首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR >Aortoiliac gadolinium-enhanced CT angiography: improved results with a 16-detector row scanner compared with a four-detector row scanner.
【24h】

Aortoiliac gadolinium-enhanced CT angiography: improved results with a 16-detector row scanner compared with a four-detector row scanner.

机译:主动脉g增强CT血管造影:与四探测器行扫描仪相比,使用16探测器行扫描仪可改善结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To assess the level of vascular enhancement of gadolinium-enhanced aortoiliac computed tomographic (CT) angiography with a 16-detector row CT scanner and to compare it with the results of previous similar studies that used four-detector row CT units. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven gadolinium-enhanced CT angiograms were obtained in 10 consecutive patients with contraindication to iodinated contrast medium with use of a 16-detector row CT scanner. In the region of interest, attenuation measurements (in HU) were obtained from the proximal abdominal aorta to the common femoral arteries during unenhanced, gadolinium-enhanced, and delayed acquisitions. The results were compared to those in the 15 consecutive patients who most recently had similar examinations performed on a four-detector row CT unit. Phantom studies with diluted gadolinium were conducted to compare attenuation between CT units. RESULTS: On four-detector row CT, throughout the scan length, mean enhancement values were 53.8 HU +/- 5.3 and 15.0 HU +/- 2.6 for gadolinium-enhanced and delayed series, respectively. For the 16-detector row CT unit, they were 76.1 HU +/- 3.4 and 21.3 HU +/- 1.3, respectively. As a result of a shorter scan time and a more optimal start time, the 16-detector row CT unit provided significantly greater and more consistent enhancement throughout the scan length compared with the four-detector row CT unit (P =.0106). Similar structures had significantly greater enhancement when 120 kV was applied instead of 140 kV (P =.0495) CONCLUSION: The 16-detector row CT scanner improved gadolinium-enhanced CT angiography results compared with the four-detector row CT unit.
机译:目的:使用16个探测器行CT扫描仪评估a增强的主动脉计算机断层摄影(CT)血管造影的血管增强水平,并将其与先前使用四探测器行CT装置的类似研究结果进行比较。材料与方法:使用16排行CT扫描仪,连续10例含碘造影剂禁忌症的连续患者获得11例CT增强的CT血管造影照片。在感兴趣的区域,在未增强,g增强和延迟采集期间,从腹主动脉近端到股总动脉获得了衰减测量值(单位:HU)。将结果与最近在四探测器行CT装置上进行过类似检查的连续15例患者进行了比较。用稀释的diluted进行幻影研究以比较CT单元之间的衰减。结果:在四探测器行CT上,在整个扫描过程中,g增强系列和延迟系列的平均增强值分别为53.8 HU +/- 5.3和15.0 HU +/- 2.6。对于16个探测器的行CT单元,它们分别为76.1 HU +/- 3.4和21.3 HU +/- 1.3。由于扫描时间更短,启动时间更理想,与四探测器行CT单元相比,在整个扫描过程中16探测器行CT单元提供了更大,更一致的增强效果(P = .0106)。当使用120 kV而不是140 kV时,类似的结构具有明显更大的增强效果(P = .0495)结论:与四探测器行CT单元相比,16探测器行CT扫描仪改善了lin增强的CT血管造影结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号