...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR >Radial Force and Wall Apposition of Balloon-expandable Vascular Stents in Eccentric Stenoses: An In Vitro Evaluation in a Curved Vessel Model.
【24h】

Radial Force and Wall Apposition of Balloon-expandable Vascular Stents in Eccentric Stenoses: An In Vitro Evaluation in a Curved Vessel Model.

机译:偏心狭窄中球囊扩张式血管支架的径向力和壁位置:弯曲血管模型的体外评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: Important criteria for optimized stent implantation are high radial force and complete apposition of the stent itself. The aim of this study was to develop a simple method to assess these parameters under controlled experimental conditions and to compare vascular stents of different designs with regard to these parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five balloon-expandable stents of different designs (Jostent Flex, MAC stent, ML-Tristar, ML-Ultra, and S670) were tested. Fourteen stents of each type were implanted in a curved plastic vessel model (curve radius, 10 mm; lumen diameter, 3.5 mm) with use of a balloon inflation pressure of 12 atm. Part of the model was a nonflexible eccentric stenosis which was 2 mm or 8 mm in length. After stent implantation, a stenosis of 10%-70% was induced and radial force of the stent struts was measured at the site of the stenosis. The apposition of the stent to the vessel wall was imaged by high-resolution radiography. RESULTS: Analysis of variance showed significant differences of radial force between the tested stents (P <.001). The ML-Tristar and ML-Ultra stents had the highest radial force with maximum mean values of 687 cN and 846 cN at a stenosis of 70% in the model with the long stenosis. The radial force of the S670 stent was the lowest whereas the MAC stents showed an intermediate radial force. Radial force of the ML-Ultra stent was as much as 3.8 times higher than the force of the S670 stent (P <.001). Fifty percent of the ML-Tristar and ML-Ultra stents did not expand sufficiently to touch the vessel surface at the outer curvature. With an inflation pressure of 17 atm, complete apposition of these stents was achieved. The highest number of apposition irregularities was found in the S670 group (13 of 14 stents), whereas the MAC stents revealed the lowest number of irregular appositions (three of 14 stents). A significant correlation was found between the number of interconnecting struts and the number of irregular apposition events (P <.01). CONCLUSIONS: This model allows an accurate in vitro evaluation of different stent parameters, such as apposition to the vessel wall and radial force. None of the investigated stents showed optimal results with respect to both parameters. The apposition behavior was significantly influenced by the architecture of the stents.
机译:目的:优化支架植入的重要标准是高径向力和支架本身的完全并置。这项研究的目的是开发一种简单的方法来评估受控实验条件下的这些参数,并就这些参数比较不同设计的血管支架。材料与方法:测试了五个不同设计的球囊扩张支架(Jostent Flex,MAC支架,ML-Tristar,ML-Ultra和S670)。使用12个大气压的气囊充气压力,将每种类型的14个支架植入弯曲的塑料血管模型中(弯曲半径为10 mm;管腔直径为3.5 mm)。该模型的一部分是长度为2毫米或8毫米的非柔性偏心狭窄。支架植入后,引起10%-70%的狭窄,并在狭窄部位测量支架支柱的径向力。通过高分辨率放射线照相术将支架与血管壁的位置成像。结果:方差分析表明被测支架之间的径向力存在显着差异(P <.001)。在长狭窄模型中,ML-Tristar和ML-Ultra支架的最大径向力最大,分别为687 cN和846 cN,狭窄率为70%。 S670支架的径向力最低,而MAC支架显示中等的径向力。 ML-Ultra支架的径向力比S670支架的力高3.8倍(P <.001)。百分之五十的ML-Tristar和ML-Ultra支架无法充分扩展,无法在外曲率处接触血管表面。在17个大气压的充气压力下,这些支架完全并置。在S670组中,并置不规则的数量最多(14个支架中的13个),而MAC支架显示不规则并置的数量最少(14个支架中的三个)。发现相互连接的支撑杆的数量与不规则并置事件的数量之间存在显着的相关性(P <.01)。结论:该模型可以对不同支架参数进行精确的体外评估,例如并置血管壁和径向力。所研究的支架均未显示出关于两个参数的最佳结果。并置行为受到支架结构的显着影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号