首页> 外文期刊>Journal of travel medicine. >Backpacking in Yosemite and Kings Canyon National Parks and neighboring wilderness areas: how safe is the water to drink?
【24h】

Backpacking in Yosemite and Kings Canyon National Parks and neighboring wilderness areas: how safe is the water to drink?

机译:在优胜美地和国王峡谷国家公园以及附近的荒野地区背包旅行:饮水的安全性如何?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the risk of acquiring disease from popular Sierra Nevada wilderness area lakes and streams. This study examines the relative risk factors for harmful waterborne microorganisms using coliforms as an indicator. METHODS: Water was collected in the backcountry Yosemite and Kings Canyon National Parks and neighboring wilderness areas. A total of 72 sites from lakes or streams were selected to statistically differentiate the risk categories: (1) natural areas rarely visited by humans or domestic animals; (2) human day use-only areas; (3) high use by backpackers; (4) high use by pack animals; and (5) cattle- and sheep-grazing tracts. Water was collected in sterile test tubes and Millipore coliform samplers during the summer of 2006. Water was analyzed at the university microbiology lab, where bacteria were harvested and then subjected to analysis using standardized techniques. Statistical analysis to compare site categories was performed using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Coliforms were found in none of the 13 wild sites, none of the 12 day hike sites, and only 3 of 18 backpacker sites (17%). In contrast, 14 of 20 sites (70%) with pack animal traffic yielded coliforms, and all 9 sites (100%) below the cattle-grazing areas grew coliforms. Differences between backpacker versus cattle or pack areas were significant, p
机译:目的:本研究的目的是确定从流行的内华达山脉荒野地区的湖泊和溪流中感染疾病的风险。本研究以大肠菌群为指标,研究了有害水生微生物的相对危险因素。方法:在偏远地区的优胜美地和国王峡谷国家公园以及邻近的荒野地区收集水。从湖泊或溪流中总共选择了72个地点,以统计学方式区分风险类别:(1)人类或家畜很少去的自然地区; (2)人日专用区; (3)背包客使用率高; (4)大量使用动物; (5)牛和绵羊放牧区。在2006年夏季,将水收集在无菌试管和密理博大肠菌取样器中。在大学微生物学实验室对水进行分析,收集细菌,然后使用标准化技术进行分析。使用费舍尔精确检验进行统计分析以比较场所类别。结果:在13个野生场所中均未发现大肠菌,在12天远足场所中均未发现大肠菌,在18个背包客场所中仅发现3个(17%)。相比之下,在有牲畜运输的20个场所中有14个场所(占70%)产生了大肠菌群,而在放牧区以下的所有9个场所(占100%)都生长了大肠菌群。背包客与牛群或背包群之间的差异显着,p <或= 0.05。所有样品均生长正常的水生细菌。放牧和打包食用的牲畜以下的地方往往具有更多的总异养细菌。结论:pack类动物使用的牛区下方的高山荒野水含有大肠菌群的风险。来自野外,远足或背包地区的水显示大肠菌的风险大大降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号