首页> 外文期刊>Journal of traumatic stress >Support mechanisms and vulnerabilities in relation to PTSD in veterans of the gulf war, iraq war, and afghanistan deployments: A systematic review
【24h】

Support mechanisms and vulnerabilities in relation to PTSD in veterans of the gulf war, iraq war, and afghanistan deployments: A systematic review

机译:海湾战争,伊拉克战争和阿富汗部署退伍军人中与PTSD相关的支持机制和漏洞:

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Pretrauma factors of psychiatric history and neuroticism have been important in highlighting vulnerability to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), whereas posttrauma support mechanisms have been associated with positive health and well-being outcomes, particularly in veterans. The relationship between these factors and PTSD has not been the subject of a systematic review in veterans. An online search was conducted, supplemented by reference list and author searches. Two investigators systematically and independently examined eligible studies. From an initial search result of 2,864, 17 met inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of unit cohesion involving 6 studies found that low unit cohesion was associated with PTSD, standardised mean difference of -1.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) [-2.80, -0.45]. A meta-analysis of social support involving 7 studies found that low social support was associated with PTSD, standardised mean difference of - 12.40, 95% CI [-3.42, -1.38]. Three of 5 studies found a significant relationship between low-family support and PTSD; insufficient data precluded a meta-analysis. Regarding pretrauma vulnerability, 2 studies on psychiatric history and 1 on neuroticism found positive relationships with PTSD. Posttrauma factors of low support were associated with higher reporting of PTSD. Cross-sectional methodology may be inadequate to capture complex relationships between support and PTSD; more longitudinal research is required.
机译:精神病史和神经质病的创伤前因素在强调创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的脆弱性方面很重要,而创伤后支持机制与积极的健康和幸福感相关,尤其是在退伍军人中。这些因素与PTSD之间的关系尚未在退伍军人中进行系统的审查。进行了在线搜索,并附有参考文献列表和作者搜索。两名研究者系统地独立检查了合格的研究。从2864个初始搜索结果中,有17个符合纳入标准。对涉及6个研究的单位内聚力的荟萃分析发现,较低的单位内聚度与PTSD,标准化平均差-1.62、95%置信区间(CI)相关[-2.80,-0.45]。对涉及7个研究的社会支持进行的荟萃分析发现,低社会支持与PTSD相关,标准化平均差异为-12.40,95%CI [-3.42,-1.38]。 5项研究中的3项发现低家庭支持与PTSD之间存在显着相关性。数据不足,无法进行荟萃分析。关于创伤前的脆弱性,有2篇关于精神病史的研究和1篇关于神经质的研究发现与PTSD呈正相关。创伤后支持率低的因素与PTSD的报告较高有关。横断面方法可能不足以捕捉支持与PTSD之间的复杂关系;需要更多的纵向研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号