...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Tropical Ecology >The effects of grazing and fire on vegetation and the vertebrate assemblage in a tropical savanna woodland in north-eastern Australia.
【24h】

The effects of grazing and fire on vegetation and the vertebrate assemblage in a tropical savanna woodland in north-eastern Australia.

机译:放牧和火灾对澳大利亚东北部热带稀树草原林地植被和脊椎动物群落的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We studied the response of vegetation and vertebrate assemblages to fire and grazing, and their interacting effects, in Eucalyptus woodland in north-eastern (Queensland) Australia. In this vegetation type, many pastures remain free of cattle grazing due to the occurrence of a native shrub poisonous to livestock. Vegetation (floristic data and 22 habitat variables) and vertebrate fauna (birds, mammals, reptiles) were sampled in 29 standardized 50x50-m quadrats in the 2001 wet season, representing four treatments: sites burnt recently (within 2 years) and grazed by cattle (4-8 ha per livestock unit); sites unburnt (last burnt >2 y ears ago) and grazed; sites burnt recently and ungrazed; and unburnt and ungrazed sites. Fire and grazing had a significant influence on vegetation: both grazing and fire reduced ground cover (fire in grazed sites 51-23%, fire in ungrazed sites 68-39%) and increased the cover of forbs (8% in burnt and grazed sites, 3% if ungrazed) and tussock grasses (20% in grazed and unburnt sites and 5% when ungrazed). Grazing caused a shift in floristic composition from the perennial hummock grass Trioda pungens to tussock grasses (e.g. Aristida spp., Enneapogon spp.), forbs (e.g. Phyllanthus spp.) and shrubs (e.g. Acacia spp.). Of the vertebrate groups, birds responded more to fire effects (9 species), reptiles to grazing effects (6 species) and mammals to the interaction (2 species). Species reacted to increases in bare ground (e.g. crested pigeon Ocyphaps lophotes, hooded robin Melanodryas cucullatus, Ctenophorus nuchalis) and to the dominant ground cover (e.g. Ctenotus pantherinus) or change in vegetation architecture (e.g. singing honeyeater Lichenostomus virescens, variegated fairy-wren Malurus lamberti). The clearest example of an interacting effect was the cycle of complementary dominance between the rodents Pseudomys delicatulus and P. desertor, the latter's post-fire recovery becoming more muted in sites where cattle grazed (modelled time for population recovery twice as long as in ungrazed sites)..
机译:我们在澳大利亚东北部(昆士兰州)的桉树林地研究了植被和脊椎动物组合对火和放牧的反应及其相互作用。在这种植被类型中,由于存在对牲畜有毒的天然灌木,许多牧场仍没有放牧牛群。在2001年的雨季,对29个标准的50x50米长方体取样了植被(植物数据和22个栖息地变量)和脊椎动物区系(鸟类,哺乳动物,爬行动物),代表了四种处理方法:最近(在两年内)焚烧并被牛放牧的地点(每个牲畜单位4-8公顷);地点未烧毁(最后烧毁在2年前),已放牧;遗址最近被烧毁并被夷为平地;以及未烧毁和未烧焦的地点。着火和放牧对植被有显着影响:放牧和着火都减少了地被植物的覆盖(草场中的火占51-23%,非草木场中的火占68-39%)并增加了草皮的覆盖率(烧伤和草场中的占8%) ,如果未擦拭则为3%)和草丛(放牧和未焚烧的部位为20%,而未擦拭则为5%)。放牧导致植物区系从多年生的吊床草Trioda ung虫向草(例如Aristida spp。,Enneapogon spp。),草(例如Phyllanthus spp。)和灌木(例如Acacia spp。)转变。在脊椎动物群体中,鸟类对火势的反应更大(9种),对爬行动物的爬行动物的反应更大(6种),对哺乳动物的相互作用的反应更大(2种)。物种对裸露地面的增加做出反应(例如凤头的Ocyphaps lophotes,带帽的知更鸟Melanodryas cucullatus,Ctenophorus nuchalis)和占优势的地面覆盖物(例如Ctenotus pantherinus)或植被结构的变化(例如唱歌的食金鱼Lichenostomus virescens,杂色的神仙MalMalurus) Lamberti)。相互作用作用的最明显例子是啮齿类动物假单胞菌和P. Desertor之间互补的优势周期,后者放牧后的恢复在牲畜放牧的地点变得更加无声(模型化的人口恢复时间是未放牧地点的两倍) )..

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号