...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of toxicology and environmental health, Part A >Review of the U.S. Army's health risk assessments for oral exposure to six chemical-warfare agents. Introduction.
【24h】

Review of the U.S. Army's health risk assessments for oral exposure to six chemical-warfare agents. Introduction.

机译:审查美国陆军对六种化学战剂的口腔接触造成的健康风险评估。介绍。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The U.S. Army is under a congressional mandate and the Chemical Weapons Convention of January 1993 to destroy its entire stockpile of chemical munitions. In addition to stockpiled munitions, nonstockpile chemical materiel (NSCM) has been identified for destruction. NSCM includes a host of lethal wastes from past disposal efforts, unserviceable munitions, chemically contaminated containers, chemical-production facilities, newly located chemical munitions, known sites containing substantial quantities of buried chemical weapons and wastes, and binary weapons and components. There are eight stockpile sites located in the continental United States and one on an island in the Pacific Ocean, and 82 NSCM locations have been identified. There are concerns, based on storage and past disposal practices, about soil and groundwater contamination at those sites. Six of the most commonly found chemical-warfare agents at stockpile and NSCM sites are the nerve agents GA, GB, GD, and VX and the vesicating (blistering) agents sulfur mustard and lewisite. To ensure that chemical contamination is reduced to safe concentrations at stockpile and NSCM sites before they are used for residential, occupational, or wildlife purposes, the U.S. Army requested that health-based exposure limits for GA, GB, GD, VX, sulfur mustard, and lewisite be developed to protect the public and the environment. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) was asked to conduct the health risk assessments and propose chronic oral reference doses (RfDs) and, where appropriate, oral slope factors (SFs) for the six agents. RfDs are toxicological values developed for noncancer effects and used as reference points to limit human oral exposure to potentially hazardous concentrations of chemicals thought to have thresholds for their effects. RfDs are estimates (with uncertainty spanning an order of magnitude or greater) of daily oral chemical exposures that are unlikely to have deleterious effects during a human lifetime. For chemicals identified as carcinogens (e.g., sulfur mustard), SFs are also calculated. SFs are estimates of upper-bound lifetime cancer risk from chronic exposure to an agent. The Army's Surgeon General adopted the proposed RfDs and SFs developed by ORNL as interim values to ensure that consistent health-based criteria were applied in ongoing initiatives requiring decisions on the safety of contaminated sites. The Army's Surgeon General also requested that the National Research Council (NRC) independently review the scientific validity of these values. The NRC assigned this task to the Committee on Toxicology (COT), and a multidisciplinary subcommittee of experts was convened to assess the scientific validity of the interim RfDs developed for GA, GB, GD, VX, sulfur mustard, and lewisite and the SF developed for sulfur mustard. Specifically, the subcommittee was asked to (1) determine whether all the relevant toxicity data were considered appropriately; (2) review the uncertainty, variability, and quality of the data; (3) determine the appropriateness of the assumptions used to derive the RfDs (e.g., the application of uncertainty factors); and (4) identify data gaps and make recommendations for future research. Although multiple agents are present at stockpile and NSCM sites, the subcommittee was asked to evaluate the agents only on an individual basis. Furthermore, although the most likely routes of exposure to chemical-warfare agents at these sites are the inhalation and dermal routes, the subcommittee was only asked to evaluate toxicological risk from the oral route at this time. The Army is in the process of developing inhalation exposure guidelines. The subcommittee was also not asked to address issues related to risk management, such as technology, detection, and feasibility.
机译:美国陆军受国会授权和1993年1月的《化学武器公约》的规定,销毁其全部化学弹药库存。除了储存的弹药之外,非储存化学物资(NSCM)也已被确定可以销毁。 NSCM包括来自过去处置工作的大量致命废物,无法使用的弹药,受化学污染的容器,化学生产设施,新近放置的化学弹药,已知位置,其中包含大量埋藏的化学武器和废物以及二元武器和组件。在美国大陆有8个储存地点,在太平洋的一个岛上有1个储存地点,并确定了82个NSCM地点。基于存储和过去的处置实践,人们担心这些地点的土壤和地下水污染。在库存和NSCM站点上最常发现的化学战剂中有六种是神经毒剂GA,GB,GD和VX,以及起泡(起泡)剂的芥子气和路易斯蛋白。为了确保将化学污染物在储存和NSCM场所用于居住,职业或野生动植物之前降低到安全浓度,美国陆军要求对GA,GB,GD,VX,硫芥菜,开发路易丝矿场以保护公众和环境。要求橡树岭国家实验室(ORNL)进行健康风险评估,并为这六种药物提出慢性口服参考剂量(RfDs),并在适当情况下提出口服坡度因子(SFs)。 RfDs是为非癌症作用而开发的毒理学值,并用作参考点,以限制人类口服暴露于认为具有作用阈值的潜在危险浓度的化学物质。 RfD是每日口服化学暴露的估计值(不确定性跨越一个数量级或更大),在人类一生中不太可能产生有害影响。对于被确定为致癌物的化学物质(例如,芥子气芥末),也要计算SFs。 SFs是由于长期接触某种药物而导致一生中上限癌症风险的估计。陆军外科医生将ORNL制定的RfD和SF提议作为临时值,以确保在需要对受污染场地的安全性做出决定的现行计划中采用一致的基于健康的标准。陆军总外科医生还要求国家研究委员会(NRC)独立审查这些值的科学有效性。 NRC将这一任务分配给了毒理学委员会(COT),并召集了一个多学科专家小组委员会,以评估针对GA,GB,GD,VX,芥子油和路易斯碱开发的临时RfD的科学有效性。用作硫芥末。具体来说,要求小组委员会(1)确定是否适当考虑了所有相关毒性数据; (2)复查数据的不确定性,可变性和质量; (3)确定用于推导RfD的假设的适当性(例如不确定性因素的应用); (4)找出数据空白并为以后的研究提出建议。尽管库存和NSCM站点中存在多种代理,但要求小组委员会仅对单个代理进行评估。此外,尽管在这些地点最可能接触化学战剂的途径是吸入途径和皮肤途径,但小组委员会目前仅被要求评估口服途径的毒理学风险。陆军正在制定吸入暴露准则。小组委员会也没有被要求处理与风险管理有关的问题,例如技术,检测和可行性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号