首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Theoretical Biology >A comparison of two methods to estimate additive-by-additive interaction of QTL effects by a simulation study
【24h】

A comparison of two methods to estimate additive-by-additive interaction of QTL effects by a simulation study

机译:通过模拟研究比较两种估算QTL效应的逐加相互作用的方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Additive-by-additive epistasis plays an important role in the genetic architecture of complex traits. The parameter connected with the additive-by-additive interaction can influence decisions concerning usefulness of the breeding material for the generation of new genotypes with characteristics improved over the parental forms. This study presents comparisons of two estimation methods of additive-by-additive interactions of QTL effects by the Monte Carlo simulation study. In the first method we assume that we observed only the plant phenotype, while in the second method we have additional information from the molecular marker observations. The obtained results show that the additive-by-additive interaction effect calculated on the basis of the marker observations is always smaller than the total additive-by-additive interaction effect obtained from phenotypic observations only. The lack of influence of the distance between markers and the number of linkage groups on the estimation of effects of additive-by-additive epistasis interaction genes by the two methods shows that both these methods may be used for different genetic maps and for different plant species.
机译:累加上位性在复杂性状的遗传结构中起着重要作用。与逐加作用相关的参数可以影响有关育种材料用于产生新基因型的决策,这些新基因型的特征优于亲本形式。这项研究通过蒙特卡洛模拟研究提出了两种估算QTL效应的逐加相互作用的方法的比较。在第一种方法中,我们假设只观察到植物表型,而在第二种方法中,我们从分子标记观察中获得了更多信息。获得的结果表明,基于标记观察结果计算的加法互作效应始终小于仅从表型观察中获得的总加法互作效应。标记之间的距离和连接基团数目对两种方法对加成-上位互作基因相互作用的影响估计没有影响,这表明这两种方法都可用于不同的遗传图谱和不同的植物物种。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号