...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Theoretical Biology >Evolutionarily stable reproductive strategies in sexual organisms: IV. Parent-offspring conflict and selection of seed size in perennial plants
【24h】

Evolutionarily stable reproductive strategies in sexual organisms: IV. Parent-offspring conflict and selection of seed size in perennial plants

机译:性生物中进化上稳定的生殖策略:IV。多年生植物的亲子冲突和种子大小的选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The provisioning of offspring in sexually reproducing organisms provides an arena in which genetic conflict of interests between parents and their offspring may be expressed. While most existing models of parent-offspring conflict consider the case of a parent that rears one offspring a year, this paper is concerned with perennial plants that produce many seeds at one time. Parent-offspring conflict is examined in the context of an integrated analysis of reproductive allocation, sex allocation, and the amount of resources invested in each offspring. I derive the evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) results for the allocation of resources when the mother plant is in control as well as when the offspring are in control, taking into account both density-independent and density-dependent population growth. To the extent that the relationships between gamete output and resource investment are linear for both sex functions, the separate treatment of reproductive effort, sex allocation, and offspring size-number compromise in modern life-history theories is justified, regardless of which side, parents or offspring, wins the conflict. In such cases, the ESS sex allocation is exactly what is found in traditional sex allocation theory, and the ESS reproductive effort maximizes the rate of population growth in density-independent populations, or the amount of resources allocated to reproduction during an average lifespan in density-dependent populations. In contrast to the previous theoretical conclusions based on the analyses of single-offspring cases, the ESS reproductive effort under the offspring's control of allocation to individual offspring is found to be lower than that when mothers are in control. This paradoxical result occurs because a mother producing fewer ovules fares better if she knows that each of her seed offspring will get more resources than the amount she is selected to give. The evolutionarily stable offspring size in both density-independent and density-dependent populations does not depend on mother's reproductive effort and investment-independent mortality, just as traditional models of offspring size-number trade-offs would predict. (C) 1998 Academic Press Limited. [References: 54]
机译:在有性生殖生物中提供后代提供了一个舞台,在这里可以表达父母与其后代之间的利益遗传冲突。尽管大多数现有的父母与子女之间的冲突模型都考虑到父母每年要养育一个子女的情况,但本文关注的是多年生植物同时产生许多种子的情况。在对生殖分配,性别分配以及在每个后代中投入的资源量进行综合分析的背景下,研究了亲子冲突。考虑到密度不依赖和密度依赖的种群增长,我得出了在母本处于控制状态以及后代处于控制状态时资源分配的进化稳定策略(ESS)结果。由于配子产出与资源投入之间的关系对于两种性别功能都是线性的,因此在现代生活史理论中,对生殖力,性别分配和后代大小-数量折衷的单独处理是合理的,无论父母是哪一方或后代赢得了冲突。在这种情况下,ESS的性别分配正好是传统性别分配理论中发现的问题,ESS的生殖努力使密度独立人群的人口增长速度最大化,或在密度平均寿命期间分配给生殖的资源数量最大化依赖人群。与以前基于单胎后代病例分析的理论结论相反,发现在由后代分配给单个后代的控制下,ESS的生殖力要比在母亲控制下的低。产生这种矛盾的结果的原因是,如果一位母亲产生的胚珠更少,那么如果她知道自己的每个后代将获得的资源多于她所选择的数量,那么她的表现会更好。正如传统的后代大小-数量权衡模型所预测的那样,在密度独立型和密度依赖型种群中,进化稳定的后代大小均不取决于母亲的生殖努力和与投资无关的死亡率。 (C)1998 Academic Press Limited。 [参考:54]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号