首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Vegetation Science >Stratified resampling of phytosociological databases: some strategies for obtaining more representative data sets for classification studies.
【24h】

Stratified resampling of phytosociological databases: some strategies for obtaining more representative data sets for classification studies.

机译:植物社会学数据库的分层重采样:为分类研究获得更多代表性数据集的一些策略。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Question: The heterogeneous origin of the data in large phytosociological databases may seriously influence the results of their analysis. Therefore we propose some strategies for stratified resampling of such databases, which may improve the representativeness of the data. We also explore the effects of different resampling options on vegetation classification. Methods: We used 6050 plot samples (releves) of mesic grasslands from the Czech Republic. We stratified this database using (1) geographical stratification in a grid; (2) habitat stratification created by an overlay of digital maps in GIS; (3) habitat stratification with strata defined by traditional phytosociological associations; (4) habitat stratification by numerical classification and (5) habitat stratification by Ellenberg indicator values. Each time we resampled the database, taking equal numbers of releves per stratum. We then carried out cluster analyses for the resampled data sets and compared the resulting classifications using a newly developed procedure. Results: Random resampling of the initial data set and geographically stratified resampling resulted in similar classifications. By contrast, classifications of the resampled data sets that were based on habitat stratifications (2-5) differed from each other and from the initial data set. Stratification 2 resulted in classifications that strongly reflected environmental factors with a coarse grain of spatial heterogeneity (e.g. macroclimate), whereas stratification 5 resulted in classifications emphasizing fine-grained factors (e.g. soil nutrient status). Stratification 3 led to the most deviating results, possibly due to the subjective nature of the traditional phytosociological classifications. Conclusions: Stratified resampling may increase the representativeness of phytosociological data sets, but different types of stratification may result in different classifications. No single resampling strategy is optimal or superior: the appropriate stratification method must be selected according to the objectives of specific studies..
机译:问题:大型植物社会学数据库中数据的异类来源可能会严重影响其分析结果。因此,我们提出了一些对此类数据库进行分层重采样的策略,可以提高数据的代表性。我们还探讨了不同重采样选项对植被分类的影响。方法:我们使用了6050个来自捷克共和国的中性草原的样地(树丛)。我们使用以下方法对数据库进行分层:(1)网格中的地理分层; (2)通过GIS中的数字地图覆盖创建的栖息地分层; (3)以传统植物社会学协会定义的地层为生境分层; (4)通过数值分类进行栖息地分层,以及(5)通过Ellenberg指标值进行栖息地分层。每次我们对数据库进行重新采样时,每个层获取相同数量的版本。然后,我们对重新采样的数据集进行了聚类分析,并使用新开发的程序比较了所得分类。结果:初始数据集的随机重采样和地理分层重采样导致了相似的分类。相比之下,基于生境分层(2-5)的重采样数据集的分类彼此之间以及与初始数据集都不同。分层2得出的分类强烈反映了环境因素,并且具有粗糙的空间异质性(例如宏观气候),而分层5得出的分类则强调了细粒度的因素(例如土壤养分状况)。分层3导致的结果偏差最大,这可能是由于传统植物社会学分类的主观性质所致。结论:分层重采样可以增加植物社会学数据集的代表性,但是不同类型的分层可能导致不同的分类。没有一个单一的重采样策略是最佳或优越的:必须根据特定研究的目标选择适当的分层方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号